SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W. P.No. 2028 of 2023 And W.M.P.No. 2118 of 2023 The President Z 309, Peruncherry Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Peruncherry, Kuthalam Taluk Tiruvarur District … Petitioner ..Vs.. 1. The State Information Commissioner A-Section, Tamil Nadu Information Commission Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Panepet, Nandanam, Chennai -600 035. 2. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Mailaduthurai Circle Mailaduthurai District. 3. M.Karthikeyan .

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W. P.No. 2028 of 2023 And W.M.P.No. 2118 of 2023 The President Z 309, Peruncherry Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Peruncherry, Kuthalam Taluk Tiruvarur District … Petitioner ..Vs.. 1. The State Information Commissioner A-Section, Tamil Nadu Information Commission Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Panepet, Nandanam, Chennai -600 035. 2. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Mailaduthurai Circle Mailaduthurai District. 3. M.Karthikeyan .

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 22.02.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W. P.No. 2028 of 2023 And W.M.P.No. 2118 of 2023 The President Z 309, Peruncherry Primary Agricultural Co-operative...

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842 of 2018.

Uncategorized

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842 of 2018.

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842...

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842 of 2018. 2. This Court, vide the aforesaid order

Uncategorized

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842 of 2018. 2. This Court, vide the aforesaid order

CONTEMPT PETITION (MD) SR NO.11505 OF 2020 M.DHANDAPANI, J. The contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging noncompliance of the order dated 27.4.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 9842...

While dealing with a case related to the provision of cable television connections to 1,848 tenements for government employees, the Madras High Court has observed that it would be sensible to deny such connections to government employees, for they would probably be more at peace without watching these television channels. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan made the observation while dismissing a writ petition filed by Star Channel, a cable TV operator at Gandhi Nagar at Goundampalayam in Coimbatore district,

Uncategorized

While dealing with a case related to the provision of cable television connections to 1,848 tenements for government employees, the Madras High Court has observed that it would be sensible to deny such connections to government employees, for they would probably be more at peace without watching these television channels. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan made the observation while dismissing a writ petition filed by Star Channel, a cable TV operator at Gandhi Nagar at Goundampalayam in Coimbatore district,

[3/1, 12:07] sekarreporter1: It would be sensible to deny cable TV connections to government servants, observes Madras High Court Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, while dismissing a writ petition filed by a cable TV operator, observed...

[3/1, 12:02] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt ACJ’s Bench to hear today a PIL seeking a direction to TN School education dept to issue mark statements with marks in individual subjects for those who passed Class X in 2020-21. Says, it was not right to just mention ‘pass’ in their mark statements. [3/1, 12:02] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[3/1, 12:02] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt ACJ’s Bench to hear today a PIL seeking a direction to TN School education dept to issue mark statements with marks in individual subjects for those who passed Class X in 2020-21. Says, it was not right to just mention ‘pass’ in their mark statements. [3/1, 12:02] sekarreporter1: .

[3/1, 12:02] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt ACJ’s Bench to hear today a PIL seeking a direction to TN School education dept to issue mark statements with marks in individual subjects for those who passed Class X...

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act can be transferred from one State to another under Section 406 CrPC: Supreme Court The Court rejected the contention that it would be impermissible to transfer cheque bounce cases on account of a non-obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the NI Act overriding Section 406 of CrPC.

Uncategorized

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act can be transferred from one State to another under Section 406 CrPC: Supreme Court The Court rejected the contention that it would be impermissible to transfer cheque bounce cases on account of a non-obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the NI Act overriding Section 406 of CrPC.

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act can be transferred from one State to another under Section 406 CrPC: Supreme Court The Court rejected the contention that it would be impermissible to transfer...

Call Now ButtonCALL ME