Follow:
- Next story தனிப்பட்ட உரிமைகளுக்கு மதிப்பு கொடுங்கள்: ஷில்பா ஷெட்டி வேண்டுகோள் #ShilpaShetty #RajKundra https://t.co/CAacYLRIn5
- Previous story SC has issued notice to states, UTs and registrar general of all HCs on the about people still being booked under Section 66A of the IT Act, which was scrapped by an apex court verdict in 2015. https://t.co/BpeX1j7t0p
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*
More
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*