aTHE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. (Order of the Court was made by The Hon’ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.R.Gopinath, learned counsel for the appellants, who submits that the directions issued by the learned single Judge treating the respondent

[9/26, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: WA.No.837 of 2020
W.A.No.837of 2020
and C.M.P.No.10611 of 2020
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon’ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.R.Gopinath, learned counsel for the
appellants, who submits that the directions issued by the learned
single Judge treating the respondent petitioner to be deemed to have
entered into service with effect from 01.09.2020, which is a date
subsequent to the delivery of the judgment and the direction to
provide employment to the respondent petitioner before November,
2020, are incongruous. It is also submitted that the imposition of
costs and other directions given are contrary to law, hence, the
impugned judgment deserves to be set aside.
2.Issue notice calling upon the respondent to answer the appeal,
within a period of six weeks.
Page 1 of 2
http://www.judis.nic.in
[9/26, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: WA.No.837 of 2020
The Hon’ble Chief Justice
and
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
(sra)
3.The appellants shall not be compelled to extend any benefit to
the respondent petitioner as a consequence of the impugned judgment
until further orders.
List on 11.11.2020.
(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
23.09.2020
sra
W.A.No.837 of 2020
Page 2 of 2
http://www.judis.nic.in