High Court Cannot Review Section 11 Arbitrator Appointment After Becoming Functus Officio: Madras HC https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/review-pleas-against-arbitrator-appointment-not-maintainable-madras-high-court-537941

You may also like...

• 

  I represent Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) legally. The group behind my father is a breakaway faction, party founder S. Ramadoss’ son Anbumani Ramadoss tells #MadrasHighCourt Says, the writ petition filed in the name of PMK, represented by its founder, is not maintainable at all and alleges that his father is trying to snatch an order from the court behind his back. However, Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan refuse to hear the submissions made on behalf of Dr. Anbumani since he is not one of the respondents in a writ petition filed by his father against the ECI alone regarding allotment of ‘mango’ symbol to the party. Judges ask the counsel, representing Dr. Anbumani, to file an appropriate application to get impleaded in the case before he could be heard. @THChennai

  February 2, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 2, 2026

• 

  THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU W.A.No.937 of 2013 For Appellant          :        Mr.Thriyambar J.Kannan                             For Respondents      :        Mr.J.Ravindran, Additional Advocate General     Assisted by Mr.B.Vijay,     Additional Government Pleader  JUDGMENT K.Kumaresh Babu, J. we direct the payment of interest as ordered from the date of filing of the Writ Petition in W.P.No.14195 of 2002.  (T.R., J.)             (K.B., J.)

  September 23, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 23, 2022

• 

  K selvaraj advocate *11.04.’21,* *“Pearls of Wisdom”*

  April 11, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 11, 2021