Follow:
- Next story BREAKING Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt clears the decks for the long awaited release of Chiyan Vikram starrer Dhruva Natchathiram on or before June 15, 2026. Orders opening of a new dedicated bank account in the name of Kondaduvom Entertainment for handling the monetary issues related to the movie and appoints an advocate as an observer/overseer to oversee the debits and remittances. Judge also makes it clear that no payment shall be made to any of the partners of Kondaduvom Entertainment either as remuneration or as share of profit without the leave of the court. Now, the film director cum co-producer Gautam Vasudev Menon would have to receive money from some investors whom he has already identified in order to settle the dues to certain creditors who have to be paid their dues before the release of the movie. He also would have to hold talks with exhibitors and others before finalising the date of release. Judge says, in case, the movie could not be released before June 15 despite best efforts, the parties can approach the court for extension of time. And applicant are directed to co operate the release of the movie Senior counsel abdul hameed appeared for me Gautam Vasudev Menon,K ravi senior advocate appeared to some creditor and Senior counsel Srinath Sridevan and advocate SR Sundar appeared for Advocate Surya Tej counsel for Punniyamoorthy and Premkumar
- Previous story [30/04, 12:02] sekarreporter1: 🦜 [30/04, 12:03] sekarreporter1: சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சங்க தேர்தல் வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை தொடங்கியது சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சங்க தேர்தல் நேற்று நடந்து முடிந்தது https://www.youtube.com/live/eMEADAqVcI0?si=gWqbQx3oCktxtGGL
Recent Posts
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.
- Madurai Bench of Madras HC Stays NMC’s 75% Attendance Rule* *02 May 2026 | Justice*: Hemant Chandangoudar
More
Recent Posts
- The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026
- Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,
- Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.
- Madurai Bench of Madras HC Stays NMC’s 75% Attendance Rule* *02 May 2026 | Justice*: Hemant Chandangoudar