Follow:
- Next story யூ டியூபர் சவுக்கு சங்கருக்கு அளிக்கப்பட்ட இடைக்கால ஜாமீனை ரத்து செய்யக்கோரி காவல்துறை தாக்கல் செய்த மனு குறித்து அவரது தாயார் பதிலளிக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
- Previous story [08/01, 11:18] Sekarreporter: Pp name [08/01, 11:18] Sekarreporter: Petition to cancel the Interim bail granted to Savukku Sankar filed by TN Police has been listed today before the Principal Bench of Madras High Court. Item number 11 before Justice Velmurugan and Justice Jothiraman Bench. Senior Counsel S. Ravi assisted by M Ramamoorthi Advocate appeared for M/ Rajkumar Pandian and Christopher, Counsel on record for the first respondent/Writ Petitioner Mrs Kamala mother of Savukku Sankar. It was pointed out that the affidavit of police served on the counsel for the first respondent was incomplete. The Public Prosecutor agreed to provide complete papers. Case adjourned to 19/01/2025 for counter and disposal [08/01, 11:18] Central Govt Advt Ramasivasanker: Mr Muniappa Raj
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11386 of 2026 Tamil Rajendiran @ R.Rajendiran .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Madurai. 4.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple,
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2270 of 2026 V.Malar … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o/ Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
- Legal Representative Of Deceased Party Can Challenge Arbitral Award U/S.34 Arbitration Act and not under Article 227 of the Constitution/Section 115 of the CPC.” Supreme Court [22/04, 15:26] sekarreporter1: 2026 INSC 393 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No……………………. OF 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16162/2023) V.K. JOHN … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. MUKANCHAND BOTHRA AND HUF (DIED) REPRESENTED BY LRS. & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T SANJAY KAROL,J.
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11386 of 2026 Tamil Rajendiran @ R.Rajendiran .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Madurai. 4.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple,
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2270 of 2026 V.Malar … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o/ Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
- Legal Representative Of Deceased Party Can Challenge Arbitral Award U/S.34 Arbitration Act and not under Article 227 of the Constitution/Section 115 of the CPC.” Supreme Court [22/04, 15:26] sekarreporter1: 2026 INSC 393 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No……………………. OF 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16162/2023) V.K. JOHN … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. MUKANCHAND BOTHRA AND HUF (DIED) REPRESENTED BY LRS. & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T SANJAY KAROL,J.