Rubt barnabos mhc advt: I have been disputing with the Appeal Examiners of Criminal and Civil Appellate and Original side and Writ Jurisdiction of Madras High Court for 4 decades
[4/28, 13:08] Rubt Three: I have been disputing with the Appeal Examiners of Criminal and Civil Appellate and Original side and Writ Jurisdiction of Madras High Court for 4 decades that they have no right to question regarding maintainability, how the prayer should be, what type of prayer to sought, delete paragraph as not necessary and should not write like that and all scrap they will tell. The majority in the Bar concede to the dictum of Appeal Examiner but not me. My standard format “I decline to answer any on your questions as you have no authority to question me in law as to how it is maintainable in law. It is Court to decide the maintainability in the course of admission. Post the matter before the Court I will answer there” “I will not correct the prayer as you have no authority to question how such prayer is maintainable. It’s the Court to decide about the relief I seek and not you. Post the matter before the Court I will answer in Court” In the year 2019 my 40 years dispute with the Appeal Examiners came to an end with the Supreme Court judgment rendered on 29.03.2019 in Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.1832 of 2019, reported in 2019 SCC On Line SC 507, paras-9 to 11 The registry does not have any such powers to examine or doubt the legal sustainability of the writ petition on any grounds before numbering nor it is permissible under the Constitution of India to confer such power on such low level officials. [4/28, 13:26] Sekarreporter: 🌹
