Follow:
- Next story Justice B.V. Nagarathna, Justice R. Mahadevan, Supreme Court The Supreme Court has reiterated that when there is a usufructuary mortgage, the period of limitation does not run from the date of creation of the mortgage but from the date of payment of mortgage either out of
- Previous story Admk former minister murder appeal case smsj bench order notice
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2451 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.1894 and 1895 of 2024 1. S.Sathish Kumar 2. S.Selvi 3. M.Sathya
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2451 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.1894 and 1895 of 2024 1. S.Sathish Kumar 2. S.Selvi 3. M.Sathya
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.