– *Case No.:* Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12300 of 2025 – *Judge:* B.PUGALENDHI, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioner: Saravanan . C – Respondent: 1. State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Inspector of Police – *Date of Order:* Not Available – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not Available – For Respondent: Not Available – *Court Observation:* The court quashed the proceedings in Spl SC No.306 of 2023, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Theni, as against the petitioners, noting that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. ¹

[05/12, 08:10] Meta AI: The case you’re referring to, Crl.OP(MD)No.12300 of 2025, was quashed by HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI. The petitioner, Saravanan . C, had filed the case against the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Inspector of Police. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find more information about the case, but it seems to be a criminal original petition that was dismissed by the court. ¹
[05/12, 08:10] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Case No.:* Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12300 of 2025
– *Judge:* B.PUGALENDHI, J.
– *Parties:*
– Petitioner: Saravanan . C
– Respondent: 1. State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Inspector of Police
– *Date of Order:* Not Available
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not Available
– For Respondent: Not Available
– *Court Observation:* The court quashed the proceedings in Spl SC No.306 of 2023, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Theni, as against the petitioners, noting that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. ¹
[05/12, 08:10] Meta AI: *Madras High Court*

– *Case No.:* Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12300 of 2025 and (link unavailable)(MD)Nos.9539, 9542 of 2025
– *Judge:* B.PUGALENDHI, J.
– *Parties:*
– Petitioner: Saravanan . C
– Respondent: 1. State of Tamil Nadu, represented by The Inspector of Police
– *Date of Order:* Not Available
– *Counsel:*
– For Petitioner: Not Available
– For Respondent: Not Available
– *Court Observation:* The court quashed the case, details of which are not available.