Follow:
- Next story HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)Nos.32317, 33112, 33197, 33724 and 34051 of 2025 and WMP(MD) Nos.25422, 26867 & 26906 of 2025 in WP(MD)No.32317 of 2025 : – Rama.Ravikumar … Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3.The Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Madurai. 4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. 5.Sikkandar Badhusah Dharga, Rep.by its Jamath Members, Thirupparankundram, Madurai
- Previous story [02/12, 08:03] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/guru_adhi/status/1995645588554305888?t=I3pPkB0E_2LXYx9Omc1OeA&s=08 [02/12, 08:04] Sekarreporter: We, the @BJP4TamilNadu Legal Cell, are proud to be part of this victorious judgment on Karthigai Deepam. Today, after hearing our submissions, the Hon’ble Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court pronounced its verdict regarding the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at the top of Thirupurakundram Hill at Dheepathoon. The Hon’ble Court directed that the lamp must be lit at the top of Thirupurakundram Hill as well. Further, the Court instructed the police department to provide protection during the lighting of the lamp. Hearty congratulations to Shri Niranjan S. Kumar, State Vice President, BJP Legal Cell, and Senior Advocate Shri Anandha Padmanabhan, Advocate Shri Anandhavalli, Advocate Shri Arun Swaminathan, Advocate Shri Subbaiah, and Advocate Shri Karthikeya Venkatachalapathy for their sincere and dedicated efforts in presenting the case before the Hon’ble Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, which resulted in this historic decision. @narendramodi @AmitShah @blsanthosh @arjunrammeghwal
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍