![ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are continuing until alternative arrangements are made. Says, deployment of five constables in the house of a police officer leads to Govt spending around Rs. 2.5 lakh per month.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.16373, 14373, 13239, 12696, 13339, 12421, 12845, 10895, 9256 and 10687 of 2021 & 14417 of 2022. The impugned orders of assessment, barring the order in W.P.No.14373 of 2021 that has been dealt with in paragraphs 11 to 19 of this order, are set aside and respondents granted liberty to issue SCN/DAO within a period of four (4) weeks from date of receipt of copy of this order. Let responses be sought, the petitioners heard and orders of assessment be passed de novo. The entirety of the exercise shall not exceed a period of sixteen (16) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 68. These Writ Petitions are allowed,
- Previous story [2/8, 12:15] sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1623210692517187584?t=11-f9WfHm338qxATNM7CZQ&s=08 [2/8, 12:15] sekarreporter1: Milani elizabath two in madras high court
Recent Posts
- [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070100582162178264 [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: DMK MLA Sekar Babu Withdraws Plea For Quashing FIR In Attempt To Murder Case For Allegedly Assaulting TVK Candidate
- [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070095370471068106 [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறைக்கு உத்தரவு பாதுகாப்பு வழங்குவது தொடர்பாக சி.வி.சண்முகம் அளித்த புகார் விவகாரம். வரும் திங்கட்கிழமை விளக்கமளிக்க காவல்துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #cvshanmugam #chennai #highcourt #thanthitv
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. Respondent/Proposed Contemnor the us AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER 1. S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Hindu, aged 54 years, residing at Flat No. 2787, TNHB Colony, Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai-625 009 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: 1. I am the petitioner herein and the petitioner in A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 30949.88% KB/S < 30 Bench would not have started or happeneu Thus, the proposed respondent has knowledge about the details of the implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court. The act of the proposed respondent is not only willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, but an ill-intended attack on the judicial system of our country. His statement has clearly established that he has no respect to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and he is above the law of the country. His statement also intended to mislead the general public that the government machinery is higher than the Judiciary and they are not obliged to follow the orders of the Courts. If this type of persons are allowed to make this type of statements, then the general public will lose confidence on the Courts which will result in serious damage to rule of law and peaceful life of the ordinary people. Hence the intentional act of the proposed respondent warranting action under sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Thus, it is just and necessary to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 in order to bring home the truth and to punish him. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Solemnly affirmed at Madurai this The 9th day of June 2026 and the contents of this affidavit were read out and explained to the deponent in Tamil deponent who understood the same put his/her signature in my presence. BEFORE ME ADVOCATE: MADURAI A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:29] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
More
Recent Posts
- [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070100582162178264 [25/06, 17:11] sekarreporter1: DMK MLA Sekar Babu Withdraws Plea For Quashing FIR In Attempt To Murder Case For Allegedly Assaulting TVK Candidate
- [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2070095370471068106 [25/06, 16:55] sekarreporter1: காவல்துறைக்கு உத்தரவு பாதுகாப்பு வழங்குவது தொடர்பாக சி.வி.சண்முகம் அளித்த புகார் விவகாரம். வரும் திங்கட்கிழமை விளக்கமளிக்க காவல்துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #cvshanmugam #chennai #highcourt #thanthitv
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. Respondent/Proposed Contemnor the us AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER 1. S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Hindu, aged 54 years, residing at Flat No. 2787, TNHB Colony, Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai-625 009 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: 1. I am the petitioner herein and the petitioner in A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 30949.88% KB/S < 30 Bench would not have started or happeneu Thus, the proposed respondent has knowledge about the details of the implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court. The act of the proposed respondent is not only willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, but an ill-intended attack on the judicial system of our country. His statement has clearly established that he has no respect to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and he is above the law of the country. His statement also intended to mislead the general public that the government machinery is higher than the Judiciary and they are not obliged to follow the orders of the Courts. If this type of persons are allowed to make this type of statements, then the general public will lose confidence on the Courts which will result in serious damage to rule of law and peaceful life of the ordinary people. Hence the intentional act of the proposed respondent warranting action under sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Thus, it is just and necessary to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 in order to bring home the truth and to punish him. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Solemnly affirmed at Madurai this The 9th day of June 2026 and the contents of this affidavit were read out and explained to the deponent in Tamil deponent who understood the same put his/her signature in my presence. BEFORE ME ADVOCATE: MADURAI A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:29] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.