Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence [1/14, 11:17] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) CTC 889 : state bank of india vs V Ramakrishnan : IBC code 2016 section 2 (e) : applicable for persons termed as personal guarantor of a corporate debtor for limited purposes of sections 60(2) & 60 ( 3)
[1/13, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 1987 (2) RCR 199 : jagtar singh vs state of punjab : constitution of india article 161 : High court cannot direct the governor to decide the mercy petition within time frames , no rush or hurry should be generated by court
[1/13, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 1995 (1) RCR 210 SC : chandra shashi vs Anil.kumar verma : An apology merely to protect against rigorous of law is not apology
[1/13, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2016 (10) SCC 676 : state bank of travancore & others vs R sobhana : Borrower losing their property for non – payment of loan , suffering from acute illness apart from severe financial distress , bank earning profit on the property , for doing complete justice , bank directed to pay Rs 5 lak to borrowers as ex gratia
[1/13, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2012 (4) CTC 257 : palanisamy NP vs state of tamil.nadu ; Any interpretation which cause damage to very cause of justice or object of act be opposed to rule of law
[1/14, 11:17] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence
[1/14, 11:17] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) CTC 889 : state bank of india vs V Ramakrishnan : IBC code 2016 section 2 (e) : applicable for persons termed as personal guarantor of a corporate debtor for limited purposes of sections 60(2) & 60 ( 3)
[1/14, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2007 (4) RCR ( criminal ) 870 SC : B suresh yadav vs sharifa bee : liability of a person can be both civil and criminal at the same time , criminal proceedings are not a short cut of other remedies available in law
[1/14, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 1995 (3) RCR 338 : Amarjeet singh vs nachhattar singh : statement made by a party before court can be taken as an undertaking to the court , wilful breach of which is misconduct amounting to civil contempt under section 2 ( b) of the contempt of courts act
[1/14, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 149 : state of Rajasthan vs shambhu kewat : crime against a society cannot be wiped of due to compromise
[1/14, 11:18] Vinothpandian: 1992 (1) RCR 525 : court on its own motion vs varinder kumar @ vittu : wilful and deliberate misleading statement before court to obtain favourable order , is contempt of court
![That apart, a learned Single Judge in Crl.O.P.No.21536 of 2022 has passed an order dated 07.09.2022 directing the CCB-I not to file final report in CCB-I P.S.Crime No.161 of 2022. Superadded, the FIR does not even disclose anything about wrongful loss to the Axis Bank and wrongful gain to the accused in the transaction. The allegations in the FIR, even if is accepted as gospel truth, does not prima facie appear to have any scope for generating “proceeds of crime” at the cost of Axis Bank. It is the simple grievance of Axis Bank that, the petitioner company did not disclose to them that there is a FEMA case against them, in the application for making foreign remittance. However, as P.N.PRAKASH, J and RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN , J gm pointed out by Mr.B.Kumar, learned Senior Counsel, the said application form does not have column in this regard. Prima facie, we find that no ‘proceeds of crime’ has been generated pursuant to the criminal activity alleged in CCB-I P.S.Crime No.161 of 2022. The petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of stay. Accordingly, there shall be an order interim stay until further orders. [PNP, J.] [TKR, J.] 20.10.2022 (2/2) gm W.M.P.No.27428 of 2022 in Writ Petition No.28140 of 2022](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
