You may also like...
-
the upshot of the above discussions, the Writ Petition has to be necessarily allowed and the excess fee and the stamp duty collected will have to be refunded by the respondents. The Writ Petition stands allowed, a Writ of Mandamus will issue directing the respondents to refund the excess stamp duty and registration fee to the tune of Rs.19,72,620/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing of this Writ Petition till date of payment. There shall be no order as to costs. 12.09.2022 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.P.No.23237 of 2018 Bell Tower Enterprises LLP, For Petitioner : Mr. Sharath Chandran for Mr. Govind Chandrasekhar For Respondents : Mrs. V.Yamunadevi Special Government Pleader O R D E R
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 6, 2022
-
-
In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 22, 2026