![[24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1992904048060796955?t=qLvvFYOrl3Jdphq8NzMLgg&s=08 [24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: Supreme Court hears Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah mosque dispute Sr Adv Shyam Divan appears for the Hindu side: This has a huge impact on other suits. When there is a lead suit then if we were to make it representative suit on behalf of plaintiff then it should be become the leading suit. There is a bar. HC has recognised that it is defendants representative suit. #KrishnaJanmabhoomi #SupremeCourt [24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: Justice PV Sanjay Kumar: Adjourned to Monday. We have not issued notice yet. We will just hear it further.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story W. P.No.4914 of 2022and W.M.P.Nos.5061 & 5062 of 2022 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. Mrs.GeethaThamaraiselvan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents and is represented by Mr.Silambannan, learned Additional Advocate General. A request is made on behalf of the respondents for some time to obtain instructions and file a counter. Stay granted
- Previous story Justice SM Subramaniam of Madras HC directs TN DGP to depute Armed Reserve Police for crowd management at Tiruchendur Subramaniaswmay Temple. Also directs temple management to control Tirusudhandirargal (freelance Archakas) & ensure that they don’t harass devotees. Full order of The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP(MD) No.1700 of 2022 SEETHARAMAN.M … PETITIONER
Recent Posts
- Ndps bail granted THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8733 of 2026 Krishna @ Varun S/o Rajagopal, No.29A, Veerapan Nayakar Street, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
More
Recent Posts
- Ndps bail granted THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8733 of 2026 Krishna @ Varun S/o Rajagopal, No.29A, Veerapan Nayakar Street, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner