Follow:
- Next story வன்முறைகள் நிறுத்தப்பட்டால் மட்டுமே குடியுரிமை திருத்த சட்டத்திற்கு எதிரான வழக்குகள் விசாரிக்கப்படும்” -உச்சநீதிமன்றம் வன்முறைகள் நிறுத்தப்பட்டால் மட்டுமே குடியுரிமை திருத்த சட்டத்திற்கு எதிரான வழக்குகள் விசாரிக்கப்படும் என்று உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. https://dailythanthi.com/News/TopNews/2020/01/09131056/SC-refuses-to-accord-urgent-hearing-on-plea-seeking.vpf
- Previous story Mhc law association pongal festival Cj photos
Recent Posts
- திருப்பத்துார் மாவட்ட பதிவாளரை தற்காலிக பணியிடை நீக்கம் செய்ததற்கும், அதன் அடிப்படையில் மேற்கொண்டு நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதற்கும் இடைக்கால தடை விதித்து சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. பணியிடை நீக்கம்
- விதிமீறல்களை சுட்டிக்காட்டாமல், திட்டங்கள் குறித்து பொதுமக்கள் கேள்வி எழுப்பும் மேடையாக பொது நல வழக்குகளை தரம் குறைக்க முடியாது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.
- “ Home > Top Stories > Supreme Court Judgments > High Courts Cannot Grant… High Courts Cannot Grant Civil Relief Through Anticipatory Bail Conditions: Supreme Court The Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court’s condition restraining accused from interfering with disputed property, holding that criminal courts cannot effectively grant relief pending in a civil suit. By : Lawbeat News Desk -SC By : Edits by Salil Tiwari Update: 2026-06-13 13:20 GMT The Supreme Court held that conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail cannot amount to granting relief that is yet to be decided by a civil court.    The Supreme Court recently held that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a high court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a pending civil suit. A Bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a Madras High Court order dated February 24, 2026.” https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/high-courts-cannot-grant-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-conditions-supreme-court-1601567#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20recently,dated%20February
- Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868
- Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari + Justice G. Arul Murugan_. *PIL Misuse + Temple + Bus Stand + Planning Decisions + Unsubstantiated Pleas*. *HJS PIL Jurisprudence, UPSC GS-2*
More
Recent Posts
- திருப்பத்துார் மாவட்ட பதிவாளரை தற்காலிக பணியிடை நீக்கம் செய்ததற்கும், அதன் அடிப்படையில் மேற்கொண்டு நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பதற்கும் இடைக்கால தடை விதித்து சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. பணியிடை நீக்கம்
- விதிமீறல்களை சுட்டிக்காட்டாமல், திட்டங்கள் குறித்து பொதுமக்கள் கேள்வி எழுப்பும் மேடையாக பொது நல வழக்குகளை தரம் குறைக்க முடியாது என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.
- “ Home > Top Stories > Supreme Court Judgments > High Courts Cannot Grant… High Courts Cannot Grant Civil Relief Through Anticipatory Bail Conditions: Supreme Court The Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court’s condition restraining accused from interfering with disputed property, holding that criminal courts cannot effectively grant relief pending in a civil suit. By : Lawbeat News Desk -SC By : Edits by Salil Tiwari Update: 2026-06-13 13:20 GMT The Supreme Court held that conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail cannot amount to granting relief that is yet to be decided by a civil court.    The Supreme Court recently held that while granting anticipatory bail in a criminal case, a high court cannot impose a condition that effectively grants relief in a pending civil suit. A Bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan partly allowed an appeal filed by Nehru Irulandi against a Madras High Court order dated February 24, 2026.” https://lawbeat.in/supreme-court-judgments/high-courts-cannot-grant-civil-relief-through-anticipatory-bail-conditions-supreme-court-1601567#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20recently,dated%20February
- Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868
- Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari + Justice G. Arul Murugan_. *PIL Misuse + Temple + Bus Stand + Planning Decisions + Unsubstantiated Pleas*. *HJS PIL Jurisprudence, UPSC GS-2*