You may also like...
-
-
Therefore, from any view of the matter, we hold that the defendants are justified in forefeiting the sum of Rs.20 Lakhs paid by the plaintiff, pursuant to Ex.A1/sale agreement and we answer the question accordingly. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.567 of 2018. Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mr.Justice D.BharathaChakaravarthy)
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 18, 2022
-
Justice P Velmurugan granted the increase in maintenance after noting that the Family Court judge failed to consider the present cost of living. He added that the child’s father failed to establish that the petitioner and her mother had sufficient income to maintain themselves without financial support from the man
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 17, 2021