You may also like...
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *W.A. 821/2021* Inspector General of Registration Vs. G. Senthil Kumar Dated: 27.07.2021 *Hon’ble Justices Pushpa Satyanarayanan & Krishnan Ramasamy* allowed the Writ Appeal in the matter relating to *“Promotion – Degree from Open University not valid for promotion when the same is prescribed as a condition for promotion”* and further held the following:
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 28, 2021
-
P.N. Prakash, J. Crl.R.C. Nos. 819 to 822 of 2013. D/d. 24.01.2020.Dishonour of Cheque – Complainant is not required to prove the debt – However, the complainant is required to plead about the existence of the debt in the complaint. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 – Dishonour of Cheque – Presumption under sections 118 and 139 – Complainant is not required to prove the debtHeard Mr. R. Sankarappan, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. M. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 9, 2020
-