Monthly Archive: March 2026

Tomorrow hearing பாமக நிறுவனர் ராமதாஸ் தரப்பில் முறையீடு பாமக மாம்பழம் சின்னம் விவகாரம் தொடர்பான உச்ச நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவு குறித்து நிறுவனர்

[24/03, 11:28] sekarreporter1: பாமக நிறுவனர் ராமதாஸ் தரப்பில் முறையீடு பாமக மாம்பழம் சின்னம் விவகாரம் தொடர்பான உச்ச நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவு குறித்து நிறுவனர் ராமதாஸ் தரப்பில் சென்னை உரிமையியல் நீதிமன்றத்தில் முறையீடு மனுவாக தாக்கல் செய்தால் வழக்கு நாளை விசாரணைக்கு எடுக்கப்படும் என நீதிபதி எம்.தர்மபிரபு...

In this regard, I humbly request the Committee to consider limiting the number of voters to not more than 600 per polling booth. Allocating more than 600 voters to a single booth may lead to congestion, delays, and inconvenience, thereby affecting the overall polling process and potentially discouraging voter participation.

1 GMK G.MOHANA KRISHNAN, BAB.L ADVOCATI KB/S V8410 26674mhn.krishnan17@gmail.com To The High-Level Election Committee Bar Council Date: 24.03.2026 Respected Sir/Madam, Sub: Request for adequate polling booths at Madras High Court premises Reg. I respectfully...

Justices P. Velmurugan and M. Jothiraman of #MadrasHighCourt to pass final orders this afternoon on a writ petition and a habeas corpus petition filed by Savukku Shankar’s mother in December 2025 when he was imprisoned in connection with an

Justices P. Velmurugan and M. Jothiraman of #MadrasHighCourt to pass final orders this afternoon on a writ petition and a habeas corpus petition filed by Savukku Shankar’s mother in December 2025 when he was...

issuance of legal heirship certificate in respect of his mother as even the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 came into force only in the year 1969, prior to which, the registration of death was not mandatory. Admittedly, the petitioner is aged about 78 years old and his father died in the year 1951 and therefore, insisting upon the production of the death certificate for the said period is wholly impermissible.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2026 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.9689 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.10451 of 2026 S.Mahalingam                       …   Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Velachery...

While re-consideration, the respondent is directed to take note of the observations made hereinabove that GST will not be included in the turnover in any of the GST returns.  This is because the definition of the turnover under the GST Law, it has been clearly spelt out that the turnover will not include all the taxes. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.   No costs.  Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.  

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :23.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.36025 of 2025 and WMP(MD) Nos.28632 and 28634 of 2025 Global Poly Bags Industries Pvt Ltd., Represented by...

23.Therefore, we are of the considered view that there is no infirmity found in the judgment and decree passed by the learned Single Judge, warrants any interference by this Court.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 11.03.2026 Pronounced on  23.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A(CAD).No.65 of 2022 1.M/s.Photon Factory    Rep....

   In light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Tirunelveli District in S.C.No.780 of 2017 dated 27.02.2023 and 28.02.2023 and accordingly, this criminal appeal stands dismissed. [N.A.V., J.]            [P.D.B., J.]

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON             : 16.03.2026 PRONOUNCED ON     :  18.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl. A(MD)No.1037 of 2023 Navaneethakrishnan    : Appellant(s)...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com