Monthly Archive: August 2025

“Shocked and pained” by the Supreme Court order to remove Allahabad HC Judge from criminal jurisdiction, 13  judges of the HC write to the HC Chief Justice to not to implement the SC order.  “#SupremeCourt does not have administrative superintendence over HCs” letter says.

“Shocked and pained” by the Supreme Court order to remove Allahabad HC Judge from criminal jurisdiction, 13 judges of the HC write to the HC Chief Justice to not to implement the SC order. “#SupremeCourt does not have administrative superintendence over HCs” letter says.

“Shocked and pained” by the Supreme Court order to remove Allahabad HC Judge from criminal jurisdiction, 13 judges of the HC write to the HC Chief Justice to not to implement the SC order....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N Kotiswar Singh made the observation while hearing petitions seeking a review of the top court’s July 2022 ruling which upheld ED’s powers of arrest, search, and seizure under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N Kotiswar Singh made the observation while hearing petitions seeking a review of the top court’s July 2022 ruling which upheld ED’s powers of arrest, search, and seizure under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Donald Trump Tariffs NewsRailway Ticket Check BorivliUP EncounterDonald TrumpWBJEE 2025 ResultDharali FloodIndia Upcoming MatchesMadhya Pradesh gang Rape ‘Can’t act like a crook’: Supreme Court’s stern words for ED; bench says agency must work ‘within...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
கலைமகள் சபா வழக்கு கூடுதல் தலைமை செயலாளர் பி.அமுதா இன்று (வெள்ளிக்கிழமை) பிற்பகல் 2.15 மணிக்கு நேரில் ஆஜராக வேண்டும்.

கலைமகள் சபா வழக்கு கூடுதல் தலைமை செயலாளர் பி.அமுதா இன்று (வெள்ளிக்கிழமை) பிற்பகல் 2.15 மணிக்கு நேரில் ஆஜராக வேண்டும்.

கலைமகள் சபா தொடர்பான வழக்கை நீதிபதி எம்.எஸ்.ரமேஷ், என்.செந்தில்குமார் ஆகியோர் விசாரித்து வருகின்றனர். இந்த வழக்கை விசாரித்த நீதிபதிகள் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவில் கூறியிருப்பதாவது:- இந்த வழக்கில் கடந்த ஏப்ரல் 24-ந்தேதி பதிவுத்துறை ஐ.ஜி. நேரில் ஆஜராகி, தமிழ்நாடு முழுவதும் பல இடங்களில் கலைமகள் சபா பெயரில் சொத்துக்கள்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the learned Magistrate. * ⁠The High Court stated it had “no hesitation in holding that the learned Magistrate disregarded mandatory requirements,” conducting proceedings in a manner that “favored the accused” * ⁠Most significantly, the High Court was “compelled to direct the Registry to place this judgment before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for consideration of appropriate action against the learned Magistrate, if deemed necessary” [07/08, 19:44] Sekarreporter: 👍

[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the learned Magistrate. * ⁠The High Court stated it had “no hesitation in holding that the learned Magistrate disregarded mandatory requirements,” conducting proceedings in a manner that “favored the accused” * ⁠Most significantly, the High Court was “compelled to direct the Registry to place this judgment before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for consideration of appropriate action against the learned Magistrate, if deemed necessary” [07/08, 19:44] Sekarreporter: 👍

[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed and the impugned judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed in C.C.No.12 of 2024 is hereby set aside. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to restore the case in C.C.No.12 of 2024 to his file. The first respondent police is directed to serve summons to the 7th accused immediately and on such service of summons within the reasonable time, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to club both the cases in C.C.No.12 of 2024 and C.C.No.485 of 2024 and to proceed with the cases commencing with the supply of copies under Section 207 Cr.P.C. In case of non-service of summons to the 7th accused within the reasonable time, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to split up the case only as against the 7th accused and to proceed with the case as against the remaining accused including the third accused.  04.08.2025 NCC     :yes/No Index     :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm To 1.The Registrar (General),    Madurai Bench of Madrash High Court,    Madurai. 2.The Judicial Magistrate No.4,    Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police,    District Crime Branch,    Thoothukudi. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,    Madurai.  K.MURALI SHANKAR   ,J. csm Pre-Delivery Order made in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1252 of 2024 Dated : 04.08.2025

In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands allowed and the impugned judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed in C.C.No.12 of 2024 is hereby set aside. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to restore the case in C.C.No.12 of 2024 to his file. The first respondent police is directed to serve summons to the 7th accused immediately and on such service of summons within the reasonable time, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to club both the cases in C.C.No.12 of 2024 and C.C.No.485 of 2024 and to proceed with the cases commencing with the supply of copies under Section 207 Cr.P.C. In case of non-service of summons to the 7th accused within the reasonable time, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi is directed to split up the case only as against the 7th accused and to proceed with the case as against the remaining accused including the third accused. 04.08.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm To 1.The Registrar (General), Madurai Bench of Madrash High Court, Madurai. 2.The Judicial Magistrate No.4, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.MURALI SHANKAR ,J. csm Pre-Delivery Order made in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1252 of 2024 Dated : 04.08.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 22.04.2025 Pronounced on : 04.08.2025 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1252 of 2024 Vivek Surana …Petitioner/ Defacto Complainant Vs. 1.State of Tamil...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
We are in agreement with the conclusion of the CESTAT in its order dated 20.10.2008.  This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is hence dismissed in terms of this order and the substantial question answered in favour of R1 and R2, the assessees. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 	 	[A.S.M., J]       [N.S., J]

We are in agreement with the conclusion of the CESTAT in its order dated 20.10.2008. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is hence dismissed in terms of this order and the substantial question answered in favour of R1 and R2, the assessees. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [A.S.M., J] [N.S., J]

2025:MHC:1898 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.M.A.No. 3142 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 The Commissioner of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version