![[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the learned Magistrate. * The High Court stated it had “no hesitation in holding that the learned Magistrate disregarded mandatory requirements,” conducting proceedings in a manner that “favored the accused” * Most significantly, the High Court was “compelled to direct the Registry to place this judgment before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for consideration of appropriate action against the learned Magistrate, if deemed necessary” [07/08, 19:44] Sekarreporter: 👍](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the learned Magistrate. * The High Court stated it had “no hesitation in holding that the learned Magistrate disregarded mandatory requirements,” conducting proceedings in a manner that “favored the accused” * Most significantly, the High Court was “compelled to direct the Registry to place this judgment before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for consideration of appropriate action against the learned Magistrate, if deemed necessary” [07/08, 19:44] Sekarreporter: 👍
[07/08, 19:43] Sekarreporter: * The High Court explicitly observed that the manner in which the case was conducted and the judgment was passed revealed a “clear miscarriage of justice” at every stage by the...
