Daily Archive: August 14, 2025

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Chennai Corporation Commissioner, the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, and the Chennai District Collector to ban

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Chennai Corporation Commissioner, the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, and the Chennai District Collector to ban

The Madras High Court, on Thursday, orally remarked that shelter homes should be established to protect stray dogs, in addition to sterilizing and vaccinating them. The court has also asked the State government to...

I am in complete agreement with the above order passed by Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Pugalendhi. The term “Vaishnavite” has a larger connotation and it should never be identified with reference to a particular community. As rightly held, all those, who worship Lord Perumal are Vaishavites and there cannot be any discrimination based on community. Therefore, the insistence of the petitioner that only a Hindu Vaishnavite Brahmin should be permitted to participate in the auction virtually tantamounts to perpetuating caste system, which does not auger well for a true vaishnavite. As has been observed supra, there is going to be no compromise to the ritual practices/agamas and also the experience in preparing prasadham in vaishnavite temple earlier for five years. If that is ensured, it does not really matter as to whether the participant belongs to a brahmin community. 13. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the relevant clause contained in the auction notice and the respondent can proceed further with the auction and finalize the same in favour of the highest bidder. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.08.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes Index: Yes Speaking Order gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm To The Executive Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukovil, Little Kancheepuram. Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 12.08.2025

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

I am in complete agreement with the above order passed by Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Pugalendhi. The term “Vaishnavite” has a larger connotation and it should never be identified with reference to a particular community. As rightly held, all those, who worship Lord Perumal are Vaishavites and there cannot be any discrimination based on community. Therefore, the insistence of the petitioner that only a Hindu Vaishnavite Brahmin should be permitted to participate in the auction virtually tantamounts to perpetuating caste system, which does not auger well for a true vaishnavite. As has been observed supra, there is going to be no compromise to the ritual practices/agamas and also the experience in preparing prasadham in vaishnavite temple earlier for five years. If that is ensured, it does not really matter as to whether the participant belongs to a brahmin community. 13. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the relevant clause contained in the auction notice and the respondent can proceed further with the auction and finalize the same in favour of the highest bidder. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.08.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes Index: Yes Speaking Order gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm To The Executive Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukovil, Little Kancheepuram. Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 12.08.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.34091 and 34094 of 2025 L.Ravi S/o.Lakshminarashiman Petitioner Vs The Executive Officer/...

We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made. However, this Court reiterates that the preappointment procedures, as contemplated by the Honourable

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made. However, this Court reiterates that the preappointment procedures, as contemplated by the Honourable

[14/08, 19:20] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxgm582CdSQM9AEQsVX8EeHQ6juOte6OXu?si=xbScNGBGCie9rive [14/08, 19:54] Sekarreporter: “We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of...

12.Accordingly, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the detenues, namely K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, Mohan Babu, R.Raj Kumar, Muthuselvan and Valarmathi, on condition that the petitioner herein or the aforesaid 6 persons shall not give any press interviews or statements or post anything in the social medias with regard to the issue in hand, till the next date of hearing. 13.Call the matter on 21.08.2025. (M.S.RAMESH,J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.) 14-08-2025 hvk Note: Issue order copy on 14.08.2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, G2, Periyamedu Police Station, Chennai-600 003. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

12.Accordingly, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the detenues, namely K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, Mohan Babu, R.Raj Kumar, Muthuselvan and Valarmathi, on condition that the petitioner herein or the aforesaid 6 persons shall not give any press interviews or statements or post anything in the social medias with regard to the issue in hand, till the next date of hearing. 13.Call the matter on 21.08.2025. (M.S.RAMESH,J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.) 14-08-2025 hvk Note: Issue order copy on 14.08.2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, G2, Periyamedu Police Station, Chennai-600 003. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

HCP.No.1599 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-08-2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN HCP.No.1599 of 2025 S.Vijay No.268, New Additional Law Chambers, 1st Floor...

Dgp order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W. P.(MD) No.21115 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD) No.16335 of 2025 K.Yasar Arafath … Petitioner -vs- 1.The Home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India North Block New Delhi-110 001 2.The Chief Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009 3.The Secretary to Government Home Department Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009 … Respondents PRAYER: Petition

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

Dgp order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W. P.(MD) No.21115 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD) No.16335 of 2025 K.Yasar Arafath … Petitioner -vs- 1.The Home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India North Block New Delhi-110 001 2.The Chief Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009 3.The Secretary to Government Home Department Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009 … Respondents PRAYER: Petition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W. P.(MD) No.21115 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD) No.16335 of 2025 K.Yasar Arafath …...

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.M.P.No.28649 of 2025 in W.P.No.18511 of 2025 The Kattalai Thambiran, Dharmapuram Adheenam Kattalai Mutt, Tirunallar, Karaikal District, Puducherry State – 609 607.

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.M.P.No.28649 of 2025 in W.P.No.18511 of 2025 The Kattalai Thambiran, Dharmapuram Adheenam Kattalai Mutt, Tirunallar, Karaikal District, Puducherry State – 609 607.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.M.P.No.28649 of 2025 in W.P.No.18511 of 2025 The Kattalai Thambiran, Dharmapuram Adheenam Kattalai Mutt, Tirunallar, Karaikal District, Puducherry...

[14/08, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Justice Ramesh: We are not saying illegal arrest, we are only saying illegal detention AAG: Whatever the nomenclature, ultimately it is the same … Lordship may consider entire scenario. [14/08, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Court: Mr. AAG, sometimes, by deferring arrest, things will cool down … Midnight you have taken (the action). [14/08, 16:44] Sekarreporter: Court points out that arrest was taken after 10 days of protests. AAG: For 10 days we were requesting, we thought amicable settlement would arrive, It did not. PIL was filed, order came, we requested, what are we supposed to do? [14/08, 16:44] Sekarreporter: Court: Don’t precipitate the matter. AAG: If that is your lordships order, I have no option but (to obey)

Uncategorized

August 14, 2025

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2025

[14/08, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Justice Ramesh: We are not saying illegal arrest, we are only saying illegal detention AAG: Whatever the nomenclature, ultimately it is the same … Lordship may consider entire scenario. [14/08, 16:41] Sekarreporter: Court: Mr. AAG, sometimes, by deferring arrest, things will cool down … Midnight you have taken (the action). [14/08, 16:44] Sekarreporter: Court points out that arrest was taken after 10 days of protests. AAG: For 10 days we were requesting, we thought amicable settlement would arrive, It did not. PIL was filed, order came, we requested, what are we supposed to do? [14/08, 16:44] Sekarreporter: Court: Don’t precipitate the matter. AAG: If that is your lordships order, I have no option but (to obey)

[Justice Ramesh: We are not saying illegal arrest, we are only saying illegal detention AAG: Whatever the nomenclature, ultimately it is the same … Lordship may consider entire scenario. Court: Mr. AAG, sometimes, by...

Daily Archive: August 14, 2025

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Chennai Corporation Commissioner, the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, and the Chennai District Collector to ban

We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made. However, this Court reiterates that the preappointment procedures, as contemplated by the Honourable

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.M.P.No.28649 of 2025 in W.P.No.18511 of 2025 The Kattalai Thambiran, Dharmapuram Adheenam Kattalai Mutt, Tirunallar, Karaikal District, Puducherry State – 609 607.

Recent Posts

Recent Posts