SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: August 13, 2025

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Armstrong accused Nagenthiran

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Armstrong accused Nagenthiran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Spilit verdict MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 & 24387 of 2025and W.M.P.Nos.27436, 27439, 27456 & 27458 of 2025 W.P.No.24381 of 2025: M.Gunasekaran … Petitioner -vs

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

Spilit verdict MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 & 24387 of 2025and W.M.P.Nos.27436, 27439, 27456 & 27458 of 2025 W.P.No.24381 of 2025: M.Gunasekaran … Petitioner -vs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 07.07.2025 Pronounced on : 31.07.2025 C O R A M: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 &...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion. https://www.sekarreporter.com/split-verdict-on-whether-the-community-status-of-a-government-employee-can-be-verified-scrutinised-after-their-retirement-while-justice-nisha-banu-opined-that-reopening-the-verification-of-a-communi/

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion. https://www.sekarreporter.com/split-verdict-on-whether-the-community-status-of-a-government-employee-can-be-verified-scrutinised-after-their-retirement-while-justice-nisha-banu-opined-that-reopening-the-verification-of-a-communi/

[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion.

The Madras High Court has delivered a split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police, by holding that the commission does not have such powers to issue arrest warrant and further held that the commission

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police, by holding that the commission does not have such powers to issue arrest warrant and further held that the commission

[13/08, 19:35] Sekarreporter: The Hon’ble Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Madras High Court on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, which sought to forbear retired judges from issuing public letters, appeals, or statements intended at influencing pending judicial proceedings, particularly in matters involving allegations against sitting judges.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

The Madras High Court on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, which sought to forbear retired judges from issuing public letters, appeals, or statements intended at influencing pending judicial proceedings, particularly in matters involving allegations against sitting judges.

Madras High Court refuses to entertain PIL seeking to restrain retired judges from issuing public letters, appeals, or statements Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, presiding over the first Division Bench along with Justice Sunder...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version