SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: August 2025

Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

Sign in Join Sign in Welcome!Log into your account your username your password Forgot your password? Create an account Sign up Welcome!Register for an account your email your username A password will be e-mailed...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that while technically the petitioner should have filed an appeal within time, the explanation given that the rectification petition was pursued first appeared to be genuine.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that while technically the petitioner should have filed an appeal within time, the explanation given that the rectification petition was pursued first appeared to be genuine.

“»Top Stories »Taxpayer Pursued… Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order] The Madras High Court condoned a 108-day delay in filing appeal after observing that...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 24, 2025

கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை

கொடுங்குற்ற வழக்குகளில் சாட்சிகளாக உள்ள குழந்தைகளை உளவியல் ரீதியாக பாதுகாப்பது தொடர்பாக வழிகாட்டி விதிமுறைகளை வகுக்க பல்வேறு துறைகள் அடங்கிய குழுவை அமைக்க முடிவு செய்துள்ளதாக, தமிழக அரசு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தில் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. கோவையில், சகோதரியை, அவரது எட்டு வயது மகளின் கண்ணெதிரே, கண்டந்துண்டமாக வெட்டிக்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to quash the FIR in Crime No.44 of 2025 under Sections 528 of BNSS, since due to previous enmity between the petitioner and the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Udhagamandalam and his spouse, who is working as Subordinate Judge, Ooty, Judicial Officers of Ooty, with their influence, a false case has been registered against the petitioner. Hence, the FIR in Crime No.44 of 2025 is hereby quashed and accordingly quashed. 9. In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To 1. The Inspector of Police, T-3 Ooty Town West Police Station, Nilgiris District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms Crl.O.P.No.21695 of 2025 04.08.2025

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 24, 2025

Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to quash the FIR in Crime No.44 of 2025 under Sections 528 of BNSS, since due to previous enmity between the petitioner and the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Udhagamandalam and his spouse, who is working as Subordinate Judge, Ooty, Judicial Officers of Ooty, with their influence, a false case has been registered against the petitioner. Hence, the FIR in Crime No.44 of 2025 is hereby quashed and accordingly quashed. 9. In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To 1. The Inspector of Police, T-3 Ooty Town West Police Station, Nilgiris District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms Crl.O.P.No.21695 of 2025 04.08.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No. 21695 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.14845 of 2025 P.Saravanan … Petitioner Vs. 1. The State Represented by Inspector...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WMP(MD) NO. 17684 of 2025 5.M/s.Excelltech Wind India Pvt Ltd., Rep.by its Authorised Signatory, Door No.4/319, Anupatty Road, Venkitapuram, Palladam –

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 24, 2025

WMP(MD) NO. 17684 of 2025 5.M/s.Excelltech Wind India Pvt Ltd., Rep.by its Authorised Signatory, Door No.4/319, Anupatty Road, Venkitapuram, Palladam –

WMP(MD) NO. 17684 of 2025 5.M/s.Excelltech Wind India Pvt Ltd., Rep.by its Authorised Signatory, Door No.4/319, Anupatty Road, Venkitapuram, Palladam – 641 665, Tirupur District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version