SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: June 2021

Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.13290 of 2021 and WMP.No.14113 of 2021 Rajaguru Spinning Mills (P) Limited., (Unit III), Rep.by its Director – B, Siva Kumar S.F.No.411, Patharai,—– ii) The Management shall deposit the aforesaid amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the event of the Management not depositing the amount in time, the concerned Respondents are at liberty to proceed further as per the impugned order; iii) ESI Corporation shall lift the attachment order so as to enable the Management / Employer to operate the Bank Account. The attachment order shall be lifted forthwith in order to enable the employer to pay the salary and to comply with the orders of this Court in this writ petition. 9. It is made clear that this Writ Petition has been entertained as a special case, owing to the present pandemic situation and this cannot be taken as a precedent for other employers to approach this Court with the similar request as the remedy is only under Section 75 of the ESI Act and thereafter under Section 82 if any adverse orders are passed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Uncategorized

Full order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.13290 of 2021 and WMP.No.14113 of 2021 Rajaguru Spinning Mills (P) Limited., (Unit III), Rep.by its Director – B, Siva Kumar S.F.No.411, Patharai,—– ii) The Management shall deposit the aforesaid amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the event of the Management not depositing the amount in time, the concerned Respondents are at liberty to proceed further as per the impugned order; iii) ESI Corporation shall lift the attachment order so as to enable the Management / Employer to operate the Bank Account. The attachment order shall be lifted forthwith in order to enable the employer to pay the salary and to comply with the orders of this Court in this writ petition. 9. It is made clear that this Writ Petition has been entertained as a special case, owing to the present pandemic situation and this cannot be taken as a precedent for other employers to approach this Court with the similar request as the remedy is only under Section 75 of the ESI Act and thereafter under Section 82 if any adverse orders are passed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.06.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.13290 of 2021 and WMP.No.14113 of 2021 Rajaguru Spinning Mills (P) Limited., (Unit III), Rep.by its Director – B,...

.. “Total Restriction On Lawyers’ Free Speech”: Plea In Kerala HC Challenges New Bar Council Rules Which Make Criticism Of Its Decisions Ground For Disqualification

Uncategorized

.. “Total Restriction On Lawyers’ Free Speech”: Plea In Kerala HC Challenges New Bar Council Rules Which Make Criticism Of Its Decisions Ground For Disqualification

Live Law Top StoriesNews UpdatesColumnsInterviewsForeign/InternationalRTIKnow the LawLaw School CornerLawyers & Law FirmsJob UpdatesBook ReviewsEvents CornerVideosSponsoredContact UsAdvertise with UsRound Ups Home > Top Stories > ‘Total Restriction On… ” Live Law Top StoriesNews UpdatesColumnsInterviewsForeign/InternationalRTIKnow the...

Full order THibE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).Nos.8091, 8093 & 9446 of 2020 W.P.(MD).No.8091 of 2020 M.Rajendran —learned Division Bench of this Court in S.K. Mahaboob Ali, Ex-CRPF Constable, Nandyal v. Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi, has held:” 20.As a single Judge, I am bound by the judgment of the Division Bench. Therefore, this Court does not find any requirement for referring the matter to a larger Bench in view of a clear statement of law consistently pronounced by two Division Benches. 21.In view of the settled law, the Sub Registrar cannot refuse to register any order or decree only on the ground that the same has been presented beyond the period of limitation provided under Section 23 of the Act. Hence, the Sub Registrar shall entertain the certified copy of the decree that is presented by the petitioners and shall register the same. 22.Insofar as the next issue regarding the registration fee that has to be levied, the law is no longer res-integra and this Court in the case of K.Krishnan referred supra has categorically held that the registration fees should be levied only on the total value of the suit and not on the value of the property. Therefore, the respondent cannot insist for the payment of the registration fees based on the value of the property. 23.In view of the above discussion, all these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to register the certified copy of the decree that is presented for registration by the petitioners and the registration fee shall be levied only on the total value of the suit. It is also made clear that no stamp duty is leviable while registering any order or decree. No costs.

Uncategorized

Full order THibE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).Nos.8091, 8093 & 9446 of 2020 W.P.(MD).No.8091 of 2020 M.Rajendran —learned Division Bench of this Court in S.K. Mahaboob Ali, Ex-CRPF Constable, Nandyal v. Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi, has held:” 20.As a single Judge, I am bound by the judgment of the Division Bench. Therefore, this Court does not find any requirement for referring the matter to a larger Bench in view of a clear statement of law consistently pronounced by two Division Benches. 21.In view of the settled law, the Sub Registrar cannot refuse to register any order or decree only on the ground that the same has been presented beyond the period of limitation provided under Section 23 of the Act. Hence, the Sub Registrar shall entertain the certified copy of the decree that is presented by the petitioners and shall register the same. 22.Insofar as the next issue regarding the registration fee that has to be levied, the law is no longer res-integra and this Court in the case of K.Krishnan referred supra has categorically held that the registration fees should be levied only on the total value of the suit and not on the value of the property. Therefore, the respondent cannot insist for the payment of the registration fees based on the value of the property. 23.In view of the above discussion, all these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to register the certified copy of the decree that is presented for registration by the petitioners and the registration fee shall be levied only on the total value of the suit. It is also made clear that no stamp duty is leviable while registering any order or decree. No costs.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2021 CORAM : THibE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).Nos.8091, 8093 & 9446 of 2020 W.P.(MD).No.8091 of 2020 M.Rajendran … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General...

[6/28, 15:49] Delhi Rti Young Inthira Jaising: Examining a recent judgment by the Madras High Court in which the court stressed the importance of preserving ancient temples and monuments and issued a slew of directions to the Tamil Nadu government to conserve the state’s cultural heritage, N.KAVITHA RAMESHWAR writes about the significance of the judgment. https://www.theleaflet.in/resurrection-of-heritage-traversing-the-madras-high-court-judgment-that-lays-the-roadmap/ [6/28, 15:50] Sekarreporter: 💐💐

Uncategorized

[6/28, 15:49] Delhi Rti Young Inthira Jaising: Examining a recent judgment by the Madras High Court in which the court stressed the importance of preserving ancient temples and monuments and issued a slew of directions to the Tamil Nadu government to conserve the state’s cultural heritage, N.KAVITHA RAMESHWAR writes about the significance of the judgment. https://www.theleaflet.in/resurrection-of-heritage-traversing-the-madras-high-court-judgment-that-lays-the-roadmap/ [6/28, 15:50] Sekarreporter: 💐💐

[6/28, 15:49] Delhi Rti Young Inthira Jaising: Examining a recent judgment by the Madras High Court in which the court stressed the importance of preserving ancient temples and monuments and issued a slew of...

Madras High Court Questions Tamil Nadu Government Over Panel On NEET Madras HC questioned Tamil Nadu government over its setting up of a committee to look into the impact of NEET

Uncategorized

Madras High Court Questions Tamil Nadu Government Over Panel On NEET Madras HC questioned Tamil Nadu government over its setting up of a committee to look into the impact of NEET

Home Videos News Beeps Offbeat Web Stories Opinion Cricket India World Notifications हिन्दी தமிழ் বাংলা Gadgets Elections Auto Movies Business Food Swirlster Doctor NDTV Photos Cities South Indians Abroad Sports People Weather Trains Art...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com