Monthly Archive: July 2020

[7/1, 16:32] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar,  My EB card entry did not reflect the deduction of earlier amount.  Thanks for swift action.  Now by EB officials  it is explained that the amount shown in the card is only after deducting the earlier payment. It was not explicitly shown that amount was adjusted. I withdraw my allegations. [7/1, 17:01] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹ok sir🙏🏾

[7/1, 16:32] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar, My EB card entry did not reflect the deduction of earlier amount. Thanks for swift action. Now by EB officials it is explained that the amount shown in the card is only after deducting the earlier payment. It was not explicitly shown that amount was adjusted. I withdraw my allegations. [7/1, 17:01] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹ok sir🙏🏾

[7/1, 16:32] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar,My EB card entry did not reflect the deduction of earlier amount.Thanks for swift action.Now by EB officials it is explained that the amount shown in the card is...

[7/1, 16:48] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:47] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278286635679903744?s=08 [7/1, 16:47] sekarreporter 9445430817: Even if it’s notified the rest of the reasons in the judgement reported in 1990 LW( Crl) 335 and the reasons given in para 9 of the orders passed in WP ( MD) 7042 /20 on 30/6/2020 may be taken into consideration for rescinding the orders transferring the case to CBI by litta Srinivasan . https://t.co [7/1, 16:51] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:50] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278287393687101440?s=08 [7/1, 16:50] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:48] Lita Srinivasan: There is no office of CBI in Tuticorin or Tirunelveli . Only in madurai . No Spl PP to appear in bail or AB which is likely to follow [7/1, 16:49] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🙏🏾

[7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278281253012115459?s=08 [7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:18] Lita Srinivasan: maintainability of the GO transferring the case to CBI .. requesting the government to rescind the order .. An offence under section 302 IPC is not a notified offence under section 3 of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 and hence the request for seeking investigation by CBI is a misapprehension . Held in the case of Saroja Vs State of TN and 6 others by JKJ and reported in 1990 LW (crl) 335 .. Lita Srinivasan [7/1, 16:23] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🙏🏾

[7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278281253012115459?s=08[7/1, 16:26] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:18] Lita Srinivasan: maintainability of the GO transferring the case to CBI .. requesting the government to rescind the order .. An offence under section...

https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278260749882634240?s=08 [7/1, 15:05] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 14:58] Judge Suthantheram: During lockdown period in the month of April no electricity consumption reading was taken by TNEB, but through message to my cell phone a demand was made to make the payment equal to a sum of rupees made in the last payment. Payment was made through online Rs. 6, 663/-. Now in the month of June meter reading was

7/1, 14:46] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278255950462242816?s=08 [7/1, 14:46] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 14:13] sekarreporter 9445430817: M.Natarajan, Chief Engineer, filed W.P.No.8664 of 2020 challenging the order deputing him to Chennai Corporation and posting one Pugazhendhi of Chennai Corporation in his place. Pugazhendhi was retired long back and the Government has given him extension of service for four years. The above extension is

[7/1, 13:46] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 13:44] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278240488991023104?s=08 [7/1, 13:45] sekarreporter 9445430817: For petner advt s .SARAVANAKUMAR argued coity order notice [7/1, 13:46] sekarreporter 9445430817: நீதிபதிகள் எம்.எம். சுந்தரேஷ் மற்றும் கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அடங்கிய அமர்வு முன்பு விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. அப்போது, மனுதாரர் சார்பாக வக்கீல் எஸ். சரவணகுமார் ஆஜராகி, மனுவுக்கு பதில் அளிக்க போலீசுக்கு உத்தரவிட வேண்டும் என்றார். [7/1, 13:47] sekarreporter 9445430817: CCTV footage cell phone conversation கேட்டு வழக்கு court order notice

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com