![. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The case cited by Litta(1990(1)L.W.335 was over ruled by DB headed by justice P.S.Misra.I argued for appelants. [7/1, 17:11] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹 [7/1, 17:15] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Sorry it was the case of P.Murugan vs State.](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story நீதிபதிகள் தேர்வு 6 பேர் மட்டும் வெற்றி
- Previous story M sathiyanarayanan judge bench order illegal construction
Recent Posts
- [25/04, 22:05] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783534512955375768?t=Opq2sGBj6wcjWdqoFNpmpg&s=08[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. Isaac Mohanlal elected as President and Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹🌹[25/04, 22:17] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783536840651468980?t=YtRNZUV3Km0w4IH2cb56jw&s=08[25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.
- Cont.P.N0.1538 ofCon(.1′.N0.1538 of 2023w.p.Nos.M429, & 31440 or 2023.p.Nos.149(), 1494, 1495, 1496, 1498, 1502, 1503 & 1506 of 2924S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.The Special Officer now appointed by the Government states that she attend’Kalaimaghal Sabha’ Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would oppose by stating that it is a statutory appointment to deal with several crores of public money, where large scale irregularities and illegalities are identified. Therefore, appointment of Special Officer to work one day in a week would be in-sufficient to deal with the affairs of ‘Kalaimaghal Sabha.’ That apart, the Special Officer has to give evidences before the Civil Courts, where suits are pending for recovery of money, property etc., wherein several crores of rupees are involved.
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that on verifying the challenged order it is proved that the respondent regarded the timely payment of the applicant of the due amounts for the variance between the GSTR 1 and 3B dated January 9, 2023. Even after the consideration the respondent incorrectly mentioned on Page 23 of the transcript that levied entity loses to settle tax liabilities within 15 days of obtaining the notice on 17th March 2023. The same claim opposes the documented proof.
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala released a directory of designated senior advocates brought out by Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum and Justice R. Mahadevan, the seniormost judge of the High Court, received the first copy in Chennai on April 24, 2024
- today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC
More
Recent Posts
- [25/04, 22:05] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:02] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783534512955375768?t=Opq2sGBj6wcjWdqoFNpmpg&s=08[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. Isaac Mohanlal elected as President and Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.[25/04, 22:03] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹🌹[25/04, 22:17] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1783536840651468980?t=YtRNZUV3Km0w4IH2cb56jw&s=08[25/04, 22:12] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) elections held today (25.04.2024). Mr. M. Saravanakumar elected as Secretary.
- Cont.P.N0.1538 ofCon(.1′.N0.1538 of 2023w.p.Nos.M429, & 31440 or 2023.p.Nos.149(), 1494, 1495, 1496, 1498, 1502, 1503 & 1506 of 2924S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.The Special Officer now appointed by the Government states that she attend’Kalaimaghal Sabha’ Mr.R.Singaravelan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would oppose by stating that it is a statutory appointment to deal with several crores of public money, where large scale irregularities and illegalities are identified. Therefore, appointment of Special Officer to work one day in a week would be in-sufficient to deal with the affairs of ‘Kalaimaghal Sabha.’ That apart, the Special Officer has to give evidences before the Civil Courts, where suits are pending for recovery of money, property etc., wherein several crores of rupees are involved.
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that on verifying the challenged order it is proved that the respondent regarded the timely payment of the applicant of the due amounts for the variance between the GSTR 1 and 3B dated January 9, 2023. Even after the consideration the respondent incorrectly mentioned on Page 23 of the transcript that levied entity loses to settle tax liabilities within 15 days of obtaining the notice on 17th March 2023. The same claim opposes the documented proof.
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala released a directory of designated senior advocates brought out by Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum and Justice R. Mahadevan, the seniormost judge of the High Court, received the first copy in Chennai on April 24, 2024
- today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC