Follow:
- Next story In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review all orders of restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir post the abrogation of the state’s special status within a week.
- Previous story [1/10, 07:48] Sekarreporter: [1/10, 07:45] Sekarreporter: The Returning Officer of Kattumannarkovil constituency in 2016 is expected to appear before Madras HC today & produce 102 postal votes that were rejected. VCK’s Thol Thirumavalavan had lost that election to AIADMK’s Murugumaran by 87 votes @THChennai https://t.co/megt8jswOf [1/10, 07:45] Sekarreporter: 🍁 [1/10, 07:48] Sekarreporter: [1/10, 07:46] Sekarreporter: Case in HC seeks DVAC probe into award of tenders by Chennai Corporation for constructing storm water drains and laying roads in bus routes. https://t.co/bMh1m8PKvO [1/10, 07:46] Sekarreporter: 🍁
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told
More
Recent Posts
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
- Justice Vijayakumar of the Madras High Court, it observed that since the Censor Board had already granted certification, the court could not interfere. Granting liberty to file a public interest litigation in connection with the issue, the judge disposed of the case with this order.
- Saravanan dmk sanathanam
- Justices G. R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the TNPCB to take action against Madurai Corporation as per Section 48 of the Act that deals with offences by government departments. Earlier, the State government had told