Follow:
- Next story Madras high court stays order directing fresh election to Nadigar Sangam msnj bench
- Previous story O.A. No. 1090 to 1092 in C.S.No 687/2019 Petition: Filed By K.Shobana( popularly know as ‘Mahanadi Shobana’) seeking to restrain M/s Symphony Recording from manufacturing, selling and distributing ‘Kanda Sasti Kavacham’ and another album. Harihara Arun Somasankar argued that there can be no rights claimed by ‘M/s Symphony Recording’ under Copyrights Act based on the agreement executed by a minor. Also section 19 of Copyrights Act restricts the rights under copyrights over and above 5 years If it’s executed for an unlimited period. The Hon’ble High Court of Madras has held that ‘When the defendant themselves claim their rights through two documents, which are prima facie illegal, any further act of the defendant in distributing, manufacturing or selling the songs of K. Shobana would be impermissible’. Hence interim injunction had been granted.
Recent Posts
- Neet HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.39756, 39578 of 2024 & 4456, 7477, 12260, 16611, 16742, 18469, 22093, 22095, 22096,
- SYNOPSIS “Examination is something quite different from education, but in the name of raising the standard of education, they are making the examinations so impossible and so severe that the backward communities which have hitherto not had the chance of entering the portals of University are absolutely kept out”
- Asg ARL sundaresan arguments [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: Airport case Arguments of Airport Authority is that running of a cinema theatre in the Airport area is against Sec 12 of the Airport Authority Act [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: Even if it is a permissible activity PVR
- Anitha sumanth j excellent speech regarding life history of sc judge Natarajan [15/11, 17:47] Sekarreporter: 👍👍
- ஜமீன்தார் / நீதிபதி நடராஜன் சமூக பணி அருமை/ ஐகோர்ட் நீதிபதி சுரேஷ் குமார் புகழாரம்
More
Recent Posts
- Neet HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.39756, 39578 of 2024 & 4456, 7477, 12260, 16611, 16742, 18469, 22093, 22095, 22096,
- SYNOPSIS “Examination is something quite different from education, but in the name of raising the standard of education, they are making the examinations so impossible and so severe that the backward communities which have hitherto not had the chance of entering the portals of University are absolutely kept out”
- Asg ARL sundaresan arguments [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: Airport case Arguments of Airport Authority is that running of a cinema theatre in the Airport area is against Sec 12 of the Airport Authority Act [15/11, 19:11] Sekarreporter: Even if it is a permissible activity PVR
- Anitha sumanth j excellent speech regarding life history of sc judge Natarajan [15/11, 17:47] Sekarreporter: 👍👍
- ஜமீன்தார் / நீதிபதி நடராஜன் சமூக பணி அருமை/ ஐகோர்ட் நீதிபதி சுரேஷ் குமார் புகழாரம்