உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரை அமர்வை அணுக நீதிபதிகள் வேல்முருகன் மற்றும் அருள் முருகன் அடங்கி அமர்வு அறிவுறுத்தல்

You may also like...

• 

  Temple case. 15 ஆண்டு போராட்டத்திற்கு பிறகு கிடைத்த வெற்றி. For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Srikanth                                  For Respondents       : Mr.T.Chezhian    Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R4    Mr.S.Sithirai Anandham for R5 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No. 27180 of 2018 and

  February 10, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2022

• 

  Appointing authority himself ineligible by operation of the law to be an Arbitrator, cannot nominate an Arbitrator. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Sections 12(5) and 34 Arbitral award – Competence of the Arbitral Tribunal to enter reference – No express waiver in writing as contemplated under the proviso to Section 12 (5) – Authority appointing the arbitrator was also ineligible – Award set aside. Judge p t asha mam

  August 30, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 30, 2020

• 

  Rajiniganth case Justice P Rajamanickam wondered why the petitioner had hurried to the court without even waiting for at least 15 days from the date of filing the complaint. Moreover, the organisation must have approached the magistrate court first before moving the high court, the judge added.

  January 24, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 24, 2020