![[7/1, 12:04] Sekarreporter 1: [7/1, 12:04] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278215261007446017?s=08 [7/1, 12:04] Sekarreporter 1: More than 75% of both high tension and low tension consumers of electricity in TN have already paid the charges for lockdown period, Tangedco tells Madras HC. AAG PH Arvindh Pandian makes the submission in reply to a PIL plea for extending last date till end of July @THChennai [7/1, 12:06] Sekarreporter 1: [7/1, 11:48] Advt Rajasekar Vot: Ad நிறுவன தலைவர் வாய்ஸ் ஆஃப் தமிழ்நாடு . [7/1, 12:05] Sekarreporter 1: [7/1, 11:54] Rajesh Mha Librarian: 👍🙏🏻 [7/1, 12:05] Rajesh Mha Librarian: நாளை ஒத்தி வைப்பு](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story To Safeguard Children, Women’, Madras HC Issues Interim Order Against ‘Sexual Ads’
- Previous story Sattakathir law conference video
Recent Posts
- S Prabakaran As the Vice Chairman Bar Council of India it is of immense joy and pleasure to state the much agitated mandatory e-filling system introduced in the District judiciary which was challenged before the Hon’ble Madras High Court today, wherein the Hon’ble Chief Justice was pleased to constituted a Special Committee consisting of Hon’ble
- மறு உத்தரவு வரும் வரை இ-பைலிங் நிறுத்தி வைப்பு R.O.C. No.42577A/2024/Comp.3 NOTIFICATION NO. 7/2026 The High Court, Madras, upon approval of the Hon’ble The Chief Justice, hereby notifies that Notification No.327/2025, dated 10.12.2025, regarding mandatory e-filing in the District Judiciary on e-filing portal (https://filing.ecourts.gov.in) is kept in abeyance until further orders. All other directions contained in the Notifications dated 03.02.2023, 03.07.2023, 03.08.2023, 16.08.2023, 24.08.2023, 12.09.2023, 12.10.2023 and 23.02.2024 stand unaltered. //BY ORDER// HIGH COURT, MADRAS Sd/- S.ALLI DATED:06.01.2026 REGISTRAR GENERAL
- The Supreme Court observed that when both the buyer and seller were at fault in performance of a contract, it would be impermissible to order forfeiture of the earnest money deposited by the buyer, as it would unjustly enrich the seller. Read more: zurl.co/NBhCO #SupremeCourt
- bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi, while allowing the Union of India’s plea against the Karnataka High Court’s decision which had allowed the appointment of the Respondent-SC category candidate to the unreserved category merely because he had secured higher final
- E filing IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) W.P. No. OF 2025 Madras High Court Advocates’ Association, Represented by its Secretary Mr.R.Krishna Kumar, High Court Buildings, Chennai-600 104.
More
Recent Posts
- S Prabakaran As the Vice Chairman Bar Council of India it is of immense joy and pleasure to state the much agitated mandatory e-filling system introduced in the District judiciary which was challenged before the Hon’ble Madras High Court today, wherein the Hon’ble Chief Justice was pleased to constituted a Special Committee consisting of Hon’ble
- மறு உத்தரவு வரும் வரை இ-பைலிங் நிறுத்தி வைப்பு R.O.C. No.42577A/2024/Comp.3 NOTIFICATION NO. 7/2026 The High Court, Madras, upon approval of the Hon’ble The Chief Justice, hereby notifies that Notification No.327/2025, dated 10.12.2025, regarding mandatory e-filing in the District Judiciary on e-filing portal (https://filing.ecourts.gov.in) is kept in abeyance until further orders. All other directions contained in the Notifications dated 03.02.2023, 03.07.2023, 03.08.2023, 16.08.2023, 24.08.2023, 12.09.2023, 12.10.2023 and 23.02.2024 stand unaltered. //BY ORDER// HIGH COURT, MADRAS Sd/- S.ALLI DATED:06.01.2026 REGISTRAR GENERAL
- The Supreme Court observed that when both the buyer and seller were at fault in performance of a contract, it would be impermissible to order forfeiture of the earnest money deposited by the buyer, as it would unjustly enrich the seller. Read more: zurl.co/NBhCO #SupremeCourt
- bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi, while allowing the Union of India’s plea against the Karnataka High Court’s decision which had allowed the appointment of the Respondent-SC category candidate to the unreserved category merely because he had secured higher final
- E filing IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) W.P. No. OF 2025 Madras High Court Advocates’ Association, Represented by its Secretary Mr.R.Krishna Kumar, High Court Buildings, Chennai-600 104.