Vishnupriya interview regarding nanadesigan passed away

You may also like...

• 

  PARTIES: AHMED GANI NATCHIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Appearances: For Appellant: Ms. Shabnam Banu For Respondent: Depratment Representative- Joint Commissioner This appeal arose before The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) challenging on the absolute confiscation of 626 grams of gold jewellery that belonged to the Appellant, a resident of Malaysia, under Sections 111(d) and 111(l) of the Customs Act, 1962 and imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the same Act by the customs authorities. The appellant was intercepted at the Airport and was interogated and gold jewellery was seized.

  June 16, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 16, 2020

• 

  We are at the threshold, don’t lose direction: CJ

  April 2, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 2, 2020

• 

  [14/03, 07:51] sekarreporter1: “Division Bench comprising Justice N. Sathish Kumar and Justice M. Jothiraman upheld the order of a Single Judge which had quashed the department’s decision to stop the pension of a respondent, Srinivasan, following his conviction in a cheque bounce case. Background” https://lawtrend.in/conviction-under-section-138-of-ni-act-is-not-grave-misconduct-pension-cannot-be-withheld-madras-high-court/#:~:text=Division%20Bench%20comprising,Background [14/03, 07:51] sekarreporter1: .. [14/03, 07:51] Meta AI: மதுரை HC டிவிஷன் பெஞ்ச் (நீதிபதிகள் N. சதீஷ்குமார், M. ஜோதிராமன்), செக் பவுன்ஸ் வழக்கில் தண்டனை பெற்ற ஸ்ரீனிவாசனின் பென்ஷனை நிறுத்திய தீர்மானத்தை ரத்து செய்த சிங்கிள் ஜட்ஜ் உத்தரவை உறுதிப்படுத்தியது—138 NI Act குற்றம் கடுமையான தவறு இல்லை எனக் கருதப்பட்டது.

  March 14, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 14, 2026