Vinothpandian: 2025 (6) CTC 372 : lucky footwear components vs authorised officer indian bank : objections raised by borrowers under section 13 ( 3 – A ) SARFASI act should sufficiently amount to objections as contemplated by statute , mere request for extension of time or waiver

[10/06, 12:28] Vinothpandian: 2025 (6) CTC 372 : lucky footwear components vs authorised officer indian bank : objections raised by borrowers under section 13 ( 3 – A ) SARFASI act should sufficiently amount to objections as contemplated by statute , mere request for extension of time or waiver of penalty does not constitute statutory objections
[10/06, 12:28] Vinothpandian: Madras High court ( DB ) WP no 20264 of 2026 dated 8th June 2026 G Alagar vs development commissioner cum secretary and others : Public interest litigation must demonstrate absence of personal interest and bona fide intent to address genuine public harm or injury , abuse of PIL mechanism by individuals with personal motives is discouraged , courts mandated to impose costs in frivolous petitions
[10/06, 12:28] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : civil appeal no 0 of 2026 @ D.no 61278 of 2025 dated 25th May 2026 : delay in re – filing an appeal under section 62of the insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016 must be supported by sufficient cause lame excuses or lack of proper justification cannot be grounds for condonation of delay