Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be

[9/28, 09:37] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in choosing a man to whom she gets married
[9/28, 09:37] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 4298 : sunil CB singh baghel and others vs state of maharastra : With regard to media reporting of criminal trial , sessions judge has no power to pass order banning print , electronic and social media from.publishing posting and reporting court proceedings , it is only high court and supreme court that have power to pass postponement orders in exceptional circumstances for a brief period
[9/28, 10:00] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) crimes 225 : Asian resurfacing of road agency pvt ltd vs CBI : mandate of speedy justice applies to the prevention of corruption act
[9/28, 10:00] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1557 : khumukcham nikita devi vs state of manipur : A victim can engage a lawyer of her choice to assist the prosecution with the permission of the court ( sec 301 CRPC 1973 )
[9/28, 10:32] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) SCC 181 : sujoy kumar chanda vs damayanti majhi : unless facts disclose a designed effort to frustrate the cause of justice with malafide , harsh comments should not be made on subordinate courts
[9/29, 10:07] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) SCC 430 : Dinubhai boghabhai solanki vs state of gujarat : In a criminal proceedings fair trial is possible only when witnesses are truthful
[9/29, 10:07] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) crimes 125 : shathi mohammad vs state of himachal pradesh : Electronic record can be proved only as per section 65- B of the evidence act
[9/29, 10:14] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRILJ 2632 : gokul alias gokula krishnan and others vs state : power of investigating agency under section 173 (8) CRPC has widest possible sanctity and cannot be restricitive in nature
[9/30, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2018 (2) crimes 255 : mahesh kumar vs state of bihar : In a recovery of ganja case , court would not be authorised to detain the accused beyond sixty days
[9/30, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 2207 : Kasimuddin Ahammad and others vs Rajjak Ali and another : The magistrate has the power to direct for further investigation only after filing of the police report in terms of section 173 ( 6) CRPC
[9/30, 09:54] Vinothpandian: 2010 (13) SCC 657 : sunil kumar sambu dayal gupta vs state of maharastra : Appellate court should not interfere with acquittal order passed by trial court merely because two views are possible in a given case
[10/1, 11:59] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) SCC 638 : B sunita vs state of telengana : success of administration of justice to a great extent depends on successful regulation of legal profession
[10/1, 11:59] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) SCC ( cri ) 386 : Nizam vs state of Rajasthan : Absence of proof of motive only demands careful scrutiny and deeper analysis of evidence adduced by prosecution
[10/1, 11:59] Vinothpandian: 2012 (8) SCC 537 : state of UP vs sanjay kumar : life imprisonment cannot be equivalent to imprisonment for 14 years or 20 years , rather it always meant as the whole natural life
[10/1, 11:59] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 268 : Raj singh vs state of haryana : law does not confer a right of self defence on a man when he himself was aggressor

You may also like...