Vinothpandian: 2012 CRI LJ 1092 : K neelamegam vs durgamoorth revenue divisional officer , sivagangai : Act constituting contempt must be an action prohibited by law , held too dangerous to punish a person without making a particular action prohibited by law
[9/2, 10:29] Vinothpandian: 2012 CRI LJ 1092 : K neelamegam vs durgamoorth revenue divisional officer , sivagangai : Act constituting contempt must be an action prohibited by law , held too dangerous to punish a person without making a particular action prohibited by law
[9/2, 10:29] Vinothpandian: 2011 (6) SCC 86 : OP sharma vs High court of punjab & haryana : Acceptance of an apology from a contemnor should only be a matter of exception and not that of a rule
[9/2, 16:07] Vinothpandian: 2011 (9) SCC 182 : state of punjab vs CBI : section 173 (8) of CRPC cannot limit or affect the inherent powers of high court to pass an order under section 482 of CRPC for fresh investigation or re investigation to prevent the abuse of any process of the court
[9/2, 16:07] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) Crimes 159 : Tejinder singh vs state of punjab : In a criminal proceedings , one accused had filed appeal against his conviction , other accused who was also convicted with the appellant had not filed appeal before supreme court , supreme court exercised its jurisdiction under art 142 of the constitution and extended the same benefits to him
[9/2, 16:18] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 691 : Punjab national bank vs consumer disputes redressal forum & others : section 34 of the SARFASI act expressly barred jurisdiction of not only civil courts but also of other authorities which would include consumer forum from granting injunction in respect of any action taken or to be taken under SARFASI act
[9/3, 13:21] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 658 : Tushar P shah vs IARC p ltd : With regard to powers of Debt recovery tribunal to execute decree where secured assets situated exclusively in another state , decree may be executed either by the court which passed it or by court to which it is sent for execution
[9/3, 13:21] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 801v: sterlite technologies ltd vs union of india : Elements of a prima facie case and question.of financial hardship required to be considered by debt recovery appellate tribunal while considering application for waiver
