Vinothpandian: 2003 (4) crimes 310 SC : Ramakant Rai vs madan rai : The hypothetical answers given by the doctors cannot corrode credibilty of eyewitness , it is trite that where the eye witnesses account is found credible and trustworthy , medical opinion

[12/10, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2003 (4) crimes 310 SC : Ramakant Rai vs madan rai : The hypothetical answers given by the doctors cannot corrode credibilty of eyewitness , it is trite that where the eye witnesses account is found credible and trustworthy , medical opinion pointing to alternative possibilities is not accepted as conclusive
[12/10, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 1997 (3) CPR 398 : KN lal vs dr KK Akhauty : It can be appreciated that a doctor may not be expected to succeed in all his ventures and cure all his patients but it is certainly expected of him as a part of his duty that he would keeep no secret from his patient and explain to him the real position so that he could seek redressal elsewhere , the doctor owes duty to the patient to exercise reasonable care in carrying out his professional skill of diagnosis , advice , surgery and treatment
[12/10, 12:43] Vinothpandian: 1985 (4) SCC 80 : pattipati venkaiah vs state of Andhra pradesh : medical science is not yet so perfect as to determine the exact time of death , nor can be the same be determined in a computerised or mathematical fashion so as to accurate to the last second
[12/10, 12:43] Vinothpandian: AIR 1984 SC 1233 : punjab singh vs state of haryana : It is well settled that medical evidence cannot override direct evidence , when direct evidence is satisfactory and reliable
[12/10, 15:44] Vinothpandian: 1982 (2) SCC 396 ; mayur panabhai shah vs state of gujarat : No presumption that the doctor is always a witness of truth , the evidence of a doctor has to be appreciated like any other witness
[12/10, 15:44] Vinothpandian: 2008 (1) crimes 305 SC : Bijoy das vs state of west bengal : Held if a dying declaration is found to be reliable then there is no need for corroboration by any witness