You may also like...
-
Justices M Sathyanarayanan and P Rajamanickam observed that the primordial submission made by the petitioner is that since the temple is located from time immemorial, some right has been created. It is open to the concerned people, in charge of the temple, to seek appropriate remedy as the said issues cannot be adjudicated by this court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 5, 2020
-
Full.order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22171 & 22173 of 2018. —The Fair and Decreetal order passed in C.M.A.No.61 of 2008 dated 08.01.2018, reversing the order of the Forest Settlement Officer, Attur, passed in F.S.C.No.839 of 2002 dated 27.06.2002 stands confirmed and consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal in C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2018 is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 30, 2021
-