![In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. [J.N.B., J.] [N.A.V., J.] 10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.7435 and 7437 of 2020Before parting with, I wish to emphasize that, there are advantages in hearing cases through Whatsapp Video Call, and the fact remains that, it is less time-consuming, and it will be helpful to analyze the exact scenario of each case, so as to arrive at a definite conclusion, as was done in the case on hand. The system of viewing disputed sites through “Whatsapp Video Call or any other Application through Video mode” can be implemented in cases pertaining to encroachments on roads, water bodies, poramboke lands, Tanks, illegal constructions, OSR, Parks, etc. to ensure that, the Officials/Authorities discharge their work without any extraneous consideration. 27. With the above direction and observations, Writ Petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions if any, are closed
- Previous story Musings At Law-XVIII Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan
Recent Posts
- Upon hearing the arguments advanced by the counsel for the Petitioner, Advocate Mrs. Y. Kavitha and the Government Pleader the Hon’ble Chief Justice Bench was pleased to allow the Writ Petition with a direction to the
- solicit your presence for the Inauguration of ADDITIONAL HERITAGE COURT BUILDING by Hon’ble Mr. Justice SURYA KANT Judge, Supreme Court of India in the august presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH Judge, Supreme Court of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. MAHADEVAN Judge, Supreme Court of India, Mr. ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL, Hon’ble Minister of State (I/C) for Law & Justice, Government of India, Hon’ble Mr.Justice MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, Chief Justice, Madras High Court,
- Ramakrishnar mat mylapore video speech
- Ramar case /quashed MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.27515 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.18575 and 18577of 2025 1. Sureshbabu 2. Ganeshbabu @ Kanmanibabu
- Mukesk high court reporter writer/ அயோத்தி ராமர் கோயில் குடமுழுக்கு விழாவை எல்.இ.டி. திரையில் காண ஒன்றுகூடியதை சட்டவிரோத கூட்டம் என தமிழ்நாடு காவல்துறை பதிவுசெய்த வழக்கை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
More
Recent Posts
- Upon hearing the arguments advanced by the counsel for the Petitioner, Advocate Mrs. Y. Kavitha and the Government Pleader the Hon’ble Chief Justice Bench was pleased to allow the Writ Petition with a direction to the
- solicit your presence for the Inauguration of ADDITIONAL HERITAGE COURT BUILDING by Hon’ble Mr. Justice SURYA KANT Judge, Supreme Court of India in the august presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH Judge, Supreme Court of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. MAHADEVAN Judge, Supreme Court of India, Mr. ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL, Hon’ble Minister of State (I/C) for Law & Justice, Government of India, Hon’ble Mr.Justice MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, Chief Justice, Madras High Court,
- Ramakrishnar mat mylapore video speech
- Ramar case /quashed MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.27515 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.18575 and 18577of 2025 1. Sureshbabu 2. Ganeshbabu @ Kanmanibabu
- Mukesk high court reporter writer/ அயோத்தி ராமர் கோயில் குடமுழுக்கு விழாவை எல்.இ.டி. திரையில் காண ஒன்றுகூடியதை சட்டவிரோத கூட்டம் என தமிழ்நாடு காவல்துறை பதிவுசெய்த வழக்கை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.