Follow:
- Next story Cruelty – Act of petitioner sending a legal notice to her seeking divorce in another country except India cannot be brought within the meaning of “Cruelty” under Section 498(A) of IPC. (Madras)https://bit.ly/2ATYmg1judge Jegatheesan Chandra —IMPORTANT Cruelty – Act of petitioner sending a legal notice to her seeking divorce in another country except India cannot be brought within the meaning of “Cruelty” under Section 498(A) of IPC Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 498(A) – Against conviction – Incidents that happened in USA do not made out a case for offence under Section 498(A) of IPC – Finding of the trial court that issuance of legal notice for divorce in USA would amount to harassment and cruelty is perverse – No evidence to prove that conduct of petitioner was of such a nature which had driven the defacto complainant to commit suicide or to cause grave injury – Act of petitioner sending a legal notice cannot be brought within the meaning of “Cruelty” under Section 498(A) of IPC – Both Court below committed error in finding the petitioner guilty – Order set aside – Petition allowed.
- Previous story Upload details of govt welfare schemes on website: HC – https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/upload-details-of-govt-welfare-schemes-on-website-hc/articleshow/76540157.cms
Recent Posts
- O.49 COURT NO.13 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.9477/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-06-2025 in CRLOP No. 17521/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras] M JEGAN MOORTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondent(s) IA No. 150630/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 150631/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 30-06-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
- MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1195 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14962 of 2022 Iyappan .
- Posco order MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1195 of 2022 and
- , this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the proceedings in in JJB No.34 of 2023, on the file of JJB Karaikal, is hereby quashed. Post this case on 06.06.2025. (N.A.V. J.) (S.M. J.)
- Proviso to Order 21 Rule 105(3) of Madras Amendment Repealed by Central Amendment: Madras High Court Declares Delay Condonation in Execution Proceedings Impermissible
More
Recent Posts
- O.49 COURT NO.13 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.9477/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-06-2025 in CRLOP No. 17521/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras] M JEGAN MOORTHY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondent(s) IA No. 150630/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 150631/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 30-06-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
- MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1195 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14962 of 2022 Iyappan .
- Posco order MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1195 of 2022 and
- , this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the proceedings in in JJB No.34 of 2023, on the file of JJB Karaikal, is hereby quashed. Post this case on 06.06.2025. (N.A.V. J.) (S.M. J.)
- Proviso to Order 21 Rule 105(3) of Madras Amendment Repealed by Central Amendment: Madras High Court Declares Delay Condonation in Execution Proceedings Impermissible
