Today vinothpandian law tips

[12/23, 09:35] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) DRTC 178 : Afsar khan vs central bank of india : Issuance of notice by lok adalat at pre litigation stage in exercise of powers under section 22 – C of legal services authorities act 1987 is only a device to explore possibilty of any settlement instead of getting the dispute adjudicated by the court
[12/23, 09:35] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 209 : KSFC vs pushpa fastners pvt ltd & others : Injunction / prohibitory relief claimed would always be in aid and assistance of main relief ( order XXX VIII rule 5 CPC 1908 )
[12/23, 09:35] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) DRTC 244 : Rajalakshmi amma vs basheer : order of attachment passed by civil court does not override or deserves to be preferred over rights of a mortgagee or effect of mortgage as an encumbrance ( section 58 transfer of property act 1882 )
[12/23, 09:35] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 455 : sun biotechnology ltd vs bihar state financial corporation : If a civil review application dismissed against orginal order which if challenged later on , limitation would run from date of original order and not from date of dismissal of review application ( section 5 limitation act )

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Call Now ButtonCALL ME