The Supreme Court on Friday (December 19) set aside a cruelty and dowry harassment case filed by a wife against her husband, holding that allegations based on his remitting money to his parents and brother and requiring her to maintain Excel sheets of household expenses did not constitute cruelty or dowry demands.
The Supreme Court on Friday (December 19) set aside a cruelty and dowry harassment case filed by a wife against her husband, holding that allegations based on his remitting money to his parents and brother and requiring her to maintain Excel sheets of household expenses did not constitute cruelty or dowry demands.
![[2/10, 19:58] Sekarreporter1: [2/10, 19:34] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 11.02.2021, K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv, “The decision of the Supreme Court upon a question of law is considered to be a binding precedent and this must be ascertained from the reasons assigned in support of the conclusion. Therefore, what is binding is the principle underlying the decision. (1) ICICI Bank -vs- Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, [(2005) 6 SCC 404], (2) State of W.B. -vs- Kesoram Industries Ltd., [(2004) 10 SCC 201], (3) Shah Prakash Anichand -vs- State of Gujarat, [(1986) 1 SCC 581]. [2/10, 19:57] [2/10, 19:58] Sekarreporter1: ..](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
