![[1/7, 16:13] Sekarreporter: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2020/01/07/%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%9c%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%a9%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%9f%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%8d/ [1/7, 16:13] Sekarreporter: ரஜினிகாந்த் தர்பார் படம் மலேசியாவில் மட்டும் வெளியிட ஐகோர்ட் தடை 4.9 கோடி ரூ டெபாசிட் செய்ய ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவு](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Justices N. Kirubakaran and P. Velmurugan have asked the State government as to why it should not constitute a statutory body, such as the Press Council of India, to take action against bogus and errant journalists. They have also called for details from the police on the criminal cases booked against those claiming to be journalists.
- Previous story Justices Vineet Kothari and R Suresh Kumar gave the directive while passing orders The judges said “We direct the authorities of Public Works Department to ensure complete closure of the units manufacturing purified water, who do not hold valid no objection certificate or permission from the department concerned either from it or from CMWSSB. It should file a compliance report on February 6.”
Recent Posts
- The court was hearing a clutch of petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into the alleged potential targeting of activists, journalists, politicians, judges and government officials using the Israeli spyware. https://www.theleaflet.in/allegations-serious-if-reports-are-correct-supreme-court-on-pegasus-row/
- Unprecedented Suit for damages filed by I.F.S. Officer against I.A.S. Officers for Rupees One Crore and One Thousand as token damage. Plaintiff: D.Ramachandran IFS (V.Retd) Through Counsel M.Ravi & Priya Ravi Summons issued by High Court, Madras IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
- Full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.07.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ ADVOCATE: M.Ravi & Priya Ravi, argued in a case relating to promotion to the post of Deputy Inspector General of Prison and the Order of Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Govindaraj : The Petitioner to make a representation setting out all the grounds with substantiating materials as well as judicial precedents to the 1st respondent within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same and after forming appropriate opinion as to the objects and reasons of the classifications particularly between the General Category and Women Category, pass a reasoned appropriate order within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
- தனுஸ் வழக்கு full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 05.08.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.33800 of 2015 Mr.K.Dhanush .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Secretary,
- court directed Dhanush to pay Rs. 30,30,757/- within 48 hours with No Cost. Vijayan Subramanian counsel for Dhanush said dhanush will pay it within 48 hours.
More
Recent Posts
- The court was hearing a clutch of petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into the alleged potential targeting of activists, journalists, politicians, judges and government officials using the Israeli spyware. https://www.theleaflet.in/allegations-serious-if-reports-are-correct-supreme-court-on-pegasus-row/
- Unprecedented Suit for damages filed by I.F.S. Officer against I.A.S. Officers for Rupees One Crore and One Thousand as token damage. Plaintiff: D.Ramachandran IFS (V.Retd) Through Counsel M.Ravi & Priya Ravi Summons issued by High Court, Madras IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
- Full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.07.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ ADVOCATE: M.Ravi & Priya Ravi, argued in a case relating to promotion to the post of Deputy Inspector General of Prison and the Order of Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.Govindaraj : The Petitioner to make a representation setting out all the grounds with substantiating materials as well as judicial precedents to the 1st respondent within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the same and after forming appropriate opinion as to the objects and reasons of the classifications particularly between the General Category and Women Category, pass a reasoned appropriate order within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
- தனுஸ் வழக்கு full order IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 05.08.2021 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.33800 of 2015 Mr.K.Dhanush .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Secretary,
- court directed Dhanush to pay Rs. 30,30,757/- within 48 hours with No Cost. Vijayan Subramanian counsel for Dhanush said dhanush will pay it within 48 hours.
