“Senior Counsel S Prabakaran, today concluded his arguments that was made on the previous hearings placing reliance upon two judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court stating that guidelines formulated by the Election Commission of India would not have the same effects as that of the statutory rules and that guidlines are only advisory and administrative in nature and cannot be treated on similar lane to that of statutory rules.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/today-27-01-2026-the-honble-madras-high-courts-first-bench-continued-its-marathon-hearing-for-the-4th-day-heard-the-matter-relating-to-one-stroke-delisting-of-474-political-parti/#:~:text=Senior%20Counsel%20S,of%20statutory%20rules.
“Senior Counsel S Prabakaran, today concluded his arguments that was made on the previous hearings placing reliance upon two judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court stating that guidelines formulated by the Election Commission of India would not have the same effects as that of the statutory rules and that guidlines are only advisory and administrative in nature and cannot be treated on similar lane to that of statutory rules.”
https://www.sekarreporter.com/today-27-01-2026-the-honble-madras-high-courts-first-bench-continued-its-marathon-hearing-for-the-4th-day-heard-the-matter-relating-to-one-stroke-delisting-of-474-political-parti/#:~:text=Senior%20Counsel%20S,of%20statutory%20rules.
