![[4/12, 11:45] Sekarreporter 1: [4/12, 11:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1249219444280197120?s=08 [4/12, 11:45] Sekarreporter 1: Meeting URL: navj super lecture more than 500 advts listening through video now super class congrats navj sir https://t.co/MCB6CLLSDM More numbers: https://t.co/a9TnLVQSQx https://t.co/RKybx1yPCV [4/12, 11:45] Sekarreporter 1: Lecture photo of lordship [4/12, 11:45] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹 [4/12, 11:46] Sekarreporter 1: Now lecture going on lordship speak from his house [4/12, 11:46] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story “Senior Counsel S Prabakaran, today concluded his arguments that was made on the previous hearings placing reliance upon two judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court stating that guidelines formulated by the Election Commission of India would not have the same effects as that of the statutory rules and that guidlines are only advisory and administrative in nature and cannot be treated on similar lane to that of statutory rules.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/today-27-01-2026-the-honble-madras-high-courts-first-bench-continued-its-marathon-hearing-for-the-4th-day-heard-the-matter-relating-to-one-stroke-delisting-of-474-political-parti/#:~:text=Senior%20Counsel%20S,of%20statutory%20rules.
- Previous story Today (27/01/2026), the Hon’ble Madras High Court’s first bench continued its marathon hearing for the 4th day, heard the matter relating to one stroke delisting of 474 political parties. The Hon’ble Madras High Court closely examined the Election Commission of India’s authority to “delist” registered political parties, raising significant constitutional questions about the absence of explicit statutory backing for such power and its implications for political participation and democratic freedoms.
Recent Posts
- It is made clear that, in case an appeal is filed as against the judgment passed in the predicate case and the same is set aside, it would be open to the Enforcement Directorate to take further steps in accordance to law. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- adras HC on Sec 48 BNSS Notice*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: BNSS 2023 + Sec 48 + Arrest Intimation + Phone Call / SMS Valid*
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxXaLYGLEerwXzHHlR4AncQHQQYrrLc31n?si=E0X1OFF6FZEFcN6A [25/07, 08:50] sekarreporter1: DON ASSOCIATES THE WISE STOIC EXPANDING OUR COMPASS: JOB OPENING – JUNIOR ADVOCATES
- https://www.livelaw.in/amp/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-refuse-quash-7237-crore-illegal-mining-case-unholy-nexus-delay-trial-542715 [25/07, 08:31] Meta AI: *Case #203: _Madras HC Refuses to Quash Rs. 7237 Crore Illegal Mining Case*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: Illegal Mining + Quashing u/Sec 482 CrPC + “Unholy Nexus” + Delay in Trial + Public Interest* *Source*:
- BEFORE THE HIGH-POWERED ELECTION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India Chairperson, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ravi Shankar Jha, Former Chief Justice, Punjab & Haryana High Court Member, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Mr. V. Giri, Learned Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India Member, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Supervisory Committee Appeal No. 108/2026 [Arising out of BCI Resolution dated 19.07.2026 (Item No.
More
Recent Posts
- It is made clear that, in case an appeal is filed as against the judgment passed in the predicate case and the same is set aside, it would be open to the Enforcement Directorate to take further steps in accordance to law. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- adras HC on Sec 48 BNSS Notice*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: BNSS 2023 + Sec 48 + Arrest Intimation + Phone Call / SMS Valid*
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxXaLYGLEerwXzHHlR4AncQHQQYrrLc31n?si=E0X1OFF6FZEFcN6A [25/07, 08:50] sekarreporter1: DON ASSOCIATES THE WISE STOIC EXPANDING OUR COMPASS: JOB OPENING – JUNIOR ADVOCATES
- https://www.livelaw.in/amp/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-refuse-quash-7237-crore-illegal-mining-case-unholy-nexus-delay-trial-542715 [25/07, 08:31] Meta AI: *Case #203: _Madras HC Refuses to Quash Rs. 7237 Crore Illegal Mining Case*_ *Court: Madras High Court* *Subject: Illegal Mining + Quashing u/Sec 482 CrPC + “Unholy Nexus” + Delay in Trial + Public Interest* *Source*:
- BEFORE THE HIGH-POWERED ELECTION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India Chairperson, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ravi Shankar Jha, Former Chief Justice, Punjab & Haryana High Court Member, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Mr. V. Giri, Learned Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India Member, High-Powered Election Supervisory Committee Supervisory Committee Appeal No. 108/2026 [Arising out of BCI Resolution dated 19.07.2026 (Item No.