You may also like...
-
The Court has held that although the Evidence Act does not strictly apply to arbitral proceedings under Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the principles underlying Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act especially the bar on using oral evidence to contradict the terms of a written, registered contract remain fundamental and must be respected when an award is tested under Section 34.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 30, 2025
-
New govt advts appointed High Court of Madras – Principal Bench No. Name Enrolment No. Post 1. Thiru.R.Ganesh Kumar MS 1387/1998 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. Thiru.A.Amarnath MS 1734/2003 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras -2- 3. Thiru.S.Yogaraja Sekar MS 4080/2015 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 4. Thiru.C.R.Malarvannan MS 1347/1996 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 5. Thiru.R.Rajasekaran MS 2179/2010 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in paragraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and appearance fee as per the Government Order 2 nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT To: The Advocates concerned, through the Deputy Director, office of the
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 21, 2026
-
HC judge Kirubakaran concerned over India’s dependency on China for medicinal ingredients
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 8, 2020
