Sabari malai case 9 judges bench hearing

You may also like...

• 

  Court Observation:* The court set aside the writ orders impugned, stating they were not in consonance with the principles settled by the Supreme Court of India. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos. 854 and 1645 of 2015 were allowed, while Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos. 1549 and 1550 of 2015 and 1529 and 1530 of 2018 were dismissed.

  December 6, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 6, 2025

• 

  THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA O.P.No.20 of 2010O.P.No.20 of 2010 award. In these circumstances, there is no infirmity or perversity in the finding of the learned arbitrator. Therefore, I do not find any ground for interfering with the award in so far it related to the second heading, namely, Claim for the payment of penal interest for the delay in payment of final bill. In fine, the award is set aside with reference to compensation granted under the head of loss of overhead charges and erosion of profit. However it is confirmed with reference to the interest granted on the delayed payment of money to the contract. The Original Petition is therefore partly allowed.

  February 10, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2020

• 

  நீதிபதி அனிதா சுமந்த் முன் மீண்டும் விசாரணைக்கு வந்த போது, அந்த விவரங்கள் சமர்ப்பிக்கப்படவில்லை. இதையடுத்து, ஏற்கனவே பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை அமல்படுத்தாத டாஸ்மாக் நிர்வாகத்துக்கு 10 ஆயிரம் ரூபாய் அபராதம் விதித்த நீதிபதி, அத்தொகையை அடையாறு புற்றுநோய் மருத்துவமனைக்கு செலுத்த உத்தரவிட்டார்.

  December 28, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 28, 2022