SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

Justice anitha sumanth There was nothing that prevented the assessing officer to have called for objections, assigning a time limit to the assessee to file the same, and disposed the objections expeditiously. The procedure set out in the case of GKN Drive shafts (India) Ltd (supra) nowhere envisages modification/expansion of the statutory limitations under the Act. 28. In light of the detailed discussion as above as well as the legal position that has been settled in several judgments discussed in the preceding paragraphs, impugned notice under Section 148 dated 12.12.2019, order dated 23.07.2021 and reference to TPO on 24.11.2020 stand vitiated by non-issue of notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and the same are quashed. 29. These Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 16.11.2022 Index : Yes Speaking Order sl To 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation Circle-1(1), BSNL Building, 4th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Transfer Pricing Officer -1(1), BSNL Building, 5th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. sl W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 & WMP.Nos.730, 731, 732 & 733 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 16.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 &...

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

Uncategorized

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 09.11.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 24.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135...

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

Uncategorized

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

Sc order we are of the view that the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence. Hence, this question should be raised by the petitioner before the Special Court, since an answer to the same would depend upon evidence as to the places where any one or more of the processes or activities mentioned in Section 3 were carried out. Therefore, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Trial Court, this writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. …………………………….J. (V. Ramasubramanian) …………………………….J. (J.B. Pardiwala) New Delhi February 07, 2023

Uncategorized

Sc order we are of the view that the issue of territorial jurisdiction cannot be decided in a writ petition, especially when there is a serious factual dispute about the place/places of commission of the offence. Hence, this question should be raised by the petitioner before the Special Court, since an answer to the same would depend upon evidence as to the places where any one or more of the processes or activities mentioned in Section 3 were carried out. Therefore, giving liberty to the petitioner to raise the issue of territorial jurisdiction before the Trial Court, this writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. …………………………….J. (V. Ramasubramanian) …………………………….J. (J.B. Pardiwala) New Delhi February 07, 2023

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 12 OF 2023 RANA AYYUB VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT …PETITIONER THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR …RESPONDENT J U D G M...

Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person [2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person [2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian

[2/8, 16:12] Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : The court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures...

Uncategorized

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.01.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.1167 of 2022 M.Gagan Bothra … Petitioner. judgment regarding marking xerox copy of cheque in 138 N.I act case Therefore, the impugned order in Crl.M.P.No.10603 of 2019 is hereby set aside and the trial Court is directed to receive the xerox copy of the disputed cheque and other related documents mentioned in Crl.M.P.No.10603 of 2019 as the secondary evidence and permit the accused/respondent to let in evidence to prove that the original cheque has been returned by the father of the petitioner on 18.07.2017 and dispose the case, within a period of four months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. With the above direction, this Criminal Revision Petition is Allowed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.01.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.1167 of 2022 M.Gagan Bothra … Petitioner /vs/ 1. JSK Film Corporation, Rep. by its Prop.J.Satish Kumar, No.47,...

Uncategorized

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Writ Petition No. 31852 of 2017 and WMP.Nos.35007 and 35008 of 2017 R. Rajesh Advocate. Thus, it could be inferred from the reading of the above-stated legal provisions that the wearing of “gown” is only optional and not mandatory before any courts other than the Supreme Court or the High Cours. The judgment of the Kerala High Court referred to above by the Petitioner is also on the point. Further, the power conferred under Rule 51 of the NCLT Rules,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.02.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Writ Petition No. 31852 of 2017 and WMP.Nos.35007...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com