SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.12291 of 2019, 3354 of 2020, 5098 of 2020, 29286 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.12579, 16137 and 19172 of 2019, 3893 of 2020, 6016 of 2020 and 28581 of 2022 WP.No.12291 of 2019 M/s.Amirta International Institute of Hotel Management, (Now known as ChennaisAmirta International Institute of Hotel Management), Represented by Authorised Signatory Mr.R.Bhoominathan, No.15/25, 3rd Cross Street, West CIT Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. … Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, GST Bhawan, 26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Gst order For the aforesaid reasons, I hold that the assumption of jurisdiction by the officials of the DGGI is valid

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 01.12.2022 Pronounced on : 02.02.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.12291 of 2019, 3354 of 2020, 5098 of 2020, 29286 of...

MADURAI: The Madurai Bench on Wednesday directed the Kanniyakumari police to consider a petition filed seeking permission to conduct a rally from Kanniyakumari to Kashmir. The petition was filed by Bharat Mukti Morcha for holding a 21-day rally with 30 to 40 people to create awareness about the alleged electronic voting machine (EVM) scams during elections. They had given a representation to the Kanniyakumari DSP seeking permission, but it was rejected. Justice K Murali Shankar, who heard the plea, told the organisation to give a fresh representation and directed the police to consider and take a decision on it within three days from the date of receiving.

Uncategorized

MADURAI: The Madurai Bench on Wednesday directed the Kanniyakumari police to consider a petition filed seeking permission to conduct a rally from Kanniyakumari to Kashmir. The petition was filed by Bharat Mukti Morcha for holding a 21-day rally with 30 to 40 people to create awareness about the alleged electronic voting machine (EVM) scams during elections. They had given a representation to the Kanniyakumari DSP seeking permission, but it was rejected. Justice K Murali Shankar, who heard the plea, told the organisation to give a fresh representation and directed the police to consider and take a decision on it within three days from the date of receiving.

The Madurai Bench on Wednesday directed the Kanniyakumari police to consider a petition filed seeking permission to conduct a rally from Kanniyakumari to Kashmir. The petition was filed by Bharat Mukti Morcha for holding...

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against three persons accused of selling banned tobacco products and Indian-made foreign liquor bottles to school and college students. The court was hearing the petitions filed on behalf of the accused, S. Uchimakali, E. Manikandan and S. Sudalaimani, who had been detained in Palayamkottai Central Prison. The accused challenged the detention order passed in 2022. The detaining authority, after considering [2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against three persons accused of selling banned tobacco products and Indian-made foreign liquor bottles to school and college students. The court was hearing the petitions filed on behalf of the accused, S. Uchimakali, E. Manikandan and S. Sudalaimani, who had been detained in Palayamkottai Central Prison. The accused challenged the detention order passed in 2022. The detaining authority, after considering [2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against...

[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13 life convicts, belonging to an intermediate caste, were released in 2019 to mark the MGR centenary celebrations. They were convicted of the charge of hacking to death six members of the Scheduled Caste in 1997, including Melavalavu panchayat president Murugesan, near Melur in [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13 life convicts, belonging to an intermediate caste, were released in 2019 to mark the MGR centenary celebrations. They were convicted of the charge of hacking to death six members of the Scheduled Caste in 1997, including Melavalavu panchayat president Murugesan, near Melur in [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13...

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

Uncategorized

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 02.12.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 19.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant Vs. Chidambaram .. Respondent Prayer:...

Uncategorized

Justice anitha sumanth There was nothing that prevented the assessing officer to have called for objections, assigning a time limit to the assessee to file the same, and disposed the objections expeditiously. The procedure set out in the case of GKN Drive shafts (India) Ltd (supra) nowhere envisages modification/expansion of the statutory limitations under the Act. 28. In light of the detailed discussion as above as well as the legal position that has been settled in several judgments discussed in the preceding paragraphs, impugned notice under Section 148 dated 12.12.2019, order dated 23.07.2021 and reference to TPO on 24.11.2020 stand vitiated by non-issue of notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and the same are quashed. 29. These Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 16.11.2022 Index : Yes Speaking Order sl To 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation Circle-1(1), BSNL Building, 4th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Transfer Pricing Officer -1(1), BSNL Building, 5th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. sl W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 & WMP.Nos.730, 731, 732 & 733 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 16.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 &...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com