SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) that it would take up a suo motu public interest litigation petition regarding the travails faced by residents of Chennai due to rainwater logging, if the situation does not improve by Friday or Saturday

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) that it would take up a suo motu public interest litigation petition regarding the travails faced by residents of Chennai due to rainwater logging, if the situation does not improve by Friday or Saturday

  The Madras High Court on Tuesday warned the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) that it would take up a suo motu public interest litigation petition regarding the travails faced by residents of Chennai due to rainwater...

[11/9, 12:16] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Ex-Minister Velumani’s case – Preliminary Inquiry Report is an off shot of SC judgment in Sirajjudin case made way back in 1972. In order to commence a Preliminary Inquiry it does not mandate for FIR. If the outcome of the Preliminary Inquiry Report manifest that no case has been made out the report need not be submitted before the Special Court dealing in PC Act but it is within the Police department where the Investigating Officer reports to his immediate superior officer and routed to the officer who is monitoring the inquiry. It depends upon case to case. When the Investigating Officer conducting the Preliminary Inquiry finds that a prima facie case has been made out then he will submit his report to his superiors and he is empowered to register the FIR and an investigation can be conducted in depth. It appears to the DMK Govt that the Investigating Officer during the regime of AIADMK Govt had tailored his report to bail out the ex-Minister Velumani from the clutches of law and the Preliminary Inquiry Report is all a farce and requires a detail investigation and accordingly DAVC has registered the FIR. The provisions of the CrPC do not empower anyone to extend the period within which the investigation must be completed and no Court either directly or indirectly can extend such period. When the DAVC has registered the FIR automatically the relief sought by Arapore Iyyakam and RS Barathi PILWP is liable to be disposed off on that ground since their agitation in a way is met by registration of the FIR. The stand taken by AG Shanmugasundram before the CJ Bench is correct in law. Final Report is the outcome of the investigation report and has to be filed before the Court to be filed with Preliminary Inquiry Report if there is. In Sirajjudin case judgment of SC in the matter of PC Act it is a must, FIR, Statement of Witnesses, Material Object Seizure Mahazar and its properties etc and the Trial Court will frame charges based on above material furnished by Police by their Final Report and that is Charge Sheet. [11/9, 12:18] Sekarreporter1: 👍🏾

Uncategorized

[11/9, 12:16] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Ex-Minister Velumani’s case – Preliminary Inquiry Report is an off shot of SC judgment in Sirajjudin case made way back in 1972. In order to commence a Preliminary Inquiry it does not mandate for FIR. If the outcome of the Preliminary Inquiry Report manifest that no case has been made out the report need not be submitted before the Special Court dealing in PC Act but it is within the Police department where the Investigating Officer reports to his immediate superior officer and routed to the officer who is monitoring the inquiry. It depends upon case to case. When the Investigating Officer conducting the Preliminary Inquiry finds that a prima facie case has been made out then he will submit his report to his superiors and he is empowered to register the FIR and an investigation can be conducted in depth. It appears to the DMK Govt that the Investigating Officer during the regime of AIADMK Govt had tailored his report to bail out the ex-Minister Velumani from the clutches of law and the Preliminary Inquiry Report is all a farce and requires a detail investigation and accordingly DAVC has registered the FIR. The provisions of the CrPC do not empower anyone to extend the period within which the investigation must be completed and no Court either directly or indirectly can extend such period. When the DAVC has registered the FIR automatically the relief sought by Arapore Iyyakam and RS Barathi PILWP is liable to be disposed off on that ground since their agitation in a way is met by registration of the FIR. The stand taken by AG Shanmugasundram before the CJ Bench is correct in law. Final Report is the outcome of the investigation report and has to be filed before the Court to be filed with Preliminary Inquiry Report if there is. In Sirajjudin case judgment of SC in the matter of PC Act it is a must, FIR, Statement of Witnesses, Material Object Seizure Mahazar and its properties etc and the Trial Court will frame charges based on above material furnished by Police by their Final Report and that is Charge Sheet. [11/9, 12:18] Sekarreporter1: 👍🏾

[11/9, 12:16] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Ex-Minister Velumani’s case – Preliminary Inquiry Report is an off shot of SC judgment in Sirajjudin case made way back in 1972. In order to commence a Preliminary Inquiry...

Uncategorized

RUPERT Mhc Advt: Ex-Minister Velumani’s case – Preliminary Inquiry Report is an off shot of SC judgment in Sirajjudin case made way back in 1972. In order to commence a Preliminary Inquiry it does not mandate for FIR. If the

[11/9, 12:16] RUPERT Mhc Advt: Ex-Minister Velumani’s case – Preliminary Inquiry Report is an off shot of SC judgment in Sirajjudin case made way back in 1972. In order to commence a Preliminary Inquiry...

Uncategorized

RUPERT Mhc Advt: In today’s Hindu news paper CJI has used the word Charge Sheet but I don’t did come from his mouth or its media word ! The media in its report repeatedly use the word Advance Bail for Anticipatory Bail & some in Bar also caught with it.The word Allegation is pronounced by visual media as Allagation and it has crept into Bar & Bench.

[11/9, 10:01] Sekarreporter1: [11/9, 08:03] RUPERT Mhc Advt: In today’s Hindu news paper CJI has used the word Charge Sheet but I don’t did come from his mouth or its media word ! The...

R sureskumar judge order ஏற்காட்டில் அமையவிருந்த மாநில அளவிலான கூட்டுறவு பயிற்சி நிலையத்தின் கட்டுமான பணிகளை நிறுத்த உத்தரவிட்டதை எதிர்த்த வழக்கில் தமிழக அரசு பதிலளிக்க சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

Uncategorized

R sureskumar judge order ஏற்காட்டில் அமையவிருந்த மாநில அளவிலான கூட்டுறவு பயிற்சி நிலையத்தின் கட்டுமான பணிகளை நிறுத்த உத்தரவிட்டதை எதிர்த்த வழக்கில் தமிழக அரசு பதிலளிக்க சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

ஏற்காட்டில் அமையவிருந்த மாநில அளவிலான கூட்டுறவு பயிற்சி நிலையத்தின் கட்டுமான பணிகளை நிறுத்த உத்தரவிட்டதை எதிர்த்த வழக்கில் தமிழக அரசு பதிலளிக்க சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது கூட்டுறவு சங்கங்களில் உள்ள இளநிலை உதவியாளர் முதல் உதவி பதிவாளர் பணியிடங்களுக்கு பயிற்சி அளிப்பதற்காக மாநில அளவிலான கூட்டுறவு பயிற்சி...

Uncategorized

Chief justice bench order சென்னை அரசு யோகா மற்றும் இயற்கை மருத்துவ கல்லூரி மற்றும் செங்கல்பட்டு சர்வதேச யோகா மற்றும் இயற்கை மருத்துவ அறிவியல் கல்வி நிறுவனத்துக்கான முதல்வர், பேராசிரியர், விரிவுரையாளர் பணி நியமனத்துக்காக அறிவிக்கப்பட்ட தற்காலிக விதிகளின் அடிப்படையில் எந்த நியமனங்களும் மேற்கொள்ளக் கூடாது என தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

சென்னை அரசு யோகா மற்றும் இயற்கை மருத்துவ கல்லூரி மற்றும் செங்கல்பட்டு சர்வதேச யோகா மற்றும் இயற்கை மருத்துவ அறிவியல் கல்வி நிறுவனத்துக்கான முதல்வர், பேராசிரியர், விரிவுரையாளர் பணி நியமனத்துக்காக அறிவிக்கப்பட்ட தற்காலிக விதிகளின் அடிப்படையில் எந்த நியமனங்களும் மேற்கொள்ளக் கூடாது என தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை...

Uncategorized

Legal full discussion regarding chargesheet -tks for participating advocates

[11/8, 15:01] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 14:59] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/g_CRPMU2cIo [11/8, 14:59] Sekarreporter1: முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் எஸ் பி வேலுமணி வழக்கு பத்து வாரத்தில் குற்றப்பத்திரிகை ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவு [11/8, 15:51] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 15:46] V subramani Advt: Sekar….courts have no authority to...

Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: Sekar 41A of Crl.P.C. Introduced only in the amendment that to if the offence punishable within SEVEN years. If final report is filed by the investigation officer, where is the question of arises. Patty jaganath must read lasted verdict delivered

Uncategorized

Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: Sekar 41A of Crl.P.C. Introduced only in the amendment that to if the offence punishable within SEVEN years. If final report is filed by the investigation officer, where is the question of arises. Patty jaganath must read lasted verdict delivered

[11/8, 18:42] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 17:13] press Generally speaking final report and the charge sheet are the same . The only difference is in the final report they may close the case but in the...

11/8, 17:13] press Generally speaking final report and the charge sheet are the same . The only difference is in the final report they may close the case but in the charge sheet if the police feels prima facie case they will proceed the investigation [11/8, 17:31] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 17:11]

Uncategorized

11/8, 17:13] press Generally speaking final report and the charge sheet are the same . The only difference is in the final report they may close the case but in the charge sheet if the police feels prima facie case they will proceed the investigation [11/8, 17:31] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 17:11]

[11/8, 18:42] Sekarreporter1: [11/8, 17:13] press Generally speaking final report and the charge sheet are the same . The only difference is in the final report they may close the case but in the...