SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2025

three-judge bench of B.R. Gavai, CJI, and Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. dismissed the appeals filed by the erstwhile promoters-cum-directors of BPSL and upheld the NCLAT’s judgment dated 17-02-2020. The Court strongly rejected the arguments raised by the appellants and the CoC regarding post-approval claims, particularly concerning Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (‘EBITDA’

three-judge bench of B.R. Gavai, CJI, and Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. dismissed the appeals filed by the erstwhile promoters-cum-directors of BPSL and upheld the NCLAT’s judgment dated 17-02-2020. The...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published October 1, 2025

Sc pulls up majestrate In these circumstances, we direct the District Judge concerned to call for an explanation of the Judge concerned and report to this Court within a month. He has to state as to why and under what circumstances, he has reported that he has ceased to have jurisdiction over the matter and would not proceed any further thereof.

1 ITEM NO.7               COURT NO.11               SECTION II-B                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION………………………………. Diary...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice C.Saravanan said that the bank attachment issued u/s 79(1)(c) needed a proper adjudication to determine whether the applicant can be obligated for the tax arrears of the company u/s 89 of the GST Act.

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 30, 2025

Justice C.Saravanan said that the bank attachment issued u/s 79(1)(c) needed a proper adjudication to determine whether the applicant can be obligated for the tax arrears of the company u/s 89 of the GST Act.

  Justice C.Saravanan said that the bank attachment issued u/s 79(1)(c) needed a proper adjudication to determine whether the applicant can be obligated for the tax arrears of the company u/s 89 of the GST Act....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version