SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Gst case Justice C. Saravanan observed that, considering the ongoing proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act and the necessity of balancing the petitioner’s tax liability and the protection of revenue, a partial stay of the impugned order was required.”

[10/11, 10:51] Sekarreporter: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-itc-blocked-over-purchases-from-non-existent-dealers-madras-hc-orders-to-debit-months-tax-liability-from-negative-block-1436814 [10/11, 10:52] Sekarreporter: “Justice C. Saravanan observed that, considering the ongoing proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act and the necessity of balancing the petitioner’s tax liability and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Auction Under SARFAESI Act Valid When Property Valued By Valuer Is Registered U/S 34AB Of Wealth-Tax Act: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/tax-cases/madras-high-court-auction-under-sarfaesi-act-valid-when-property-valued-valuer-registered-us-34ab-of-wealth-tax-act-309303 [10/11, 09:28] Sekarreporter:

[10/11, 09:28] Sekarreporter: Auction Under SARFAESI Act Valid When Property Valued By Valuer Is Registered U/S 34AB Of Wealth-Tax Act: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/tax-cases/madras-high-court-auction-under-sarfaesi-act-valid-when-property-valued-valuer-registered-us-34ab-of-wealth-tax-act-309303 [10/11, 09:28] Sekarreporter: menu_bar Live Law home-iconTop StoriesNews UpdatesColumnsInterviewsForeign/InternationalRTIKnow the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

நீதிபதி பிபி. பாலாஜி விசாரித்து கோயில் நிலத்தை விற்க தடை

சென்னை கந்கோட்டை கோயில் அறங்காவலர்கள் இரண்டு பேர் சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டில் தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கில், சென்னை யில் உள்ள கந்தகோட்டம் கோயில் நிலம் சென்னை ராயபுரத்தில் உள்ளது. 1.6 ஏக்கர் நிலத்தை விற்க சிலர் முயற்சி செய்துவருகிறார்கள். எனவே இதற்கு தடை விதிக்கவேண்டும். 300 ஆண்டுகள் பழமைவாய்ந்த...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Justice M Dhandapani of the Madras high court faced the question that lay at the heart of the case: Can a transgender person be treated as a “single person” under Section 57(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015? Justice Dhandapani said his hands were tied as adoption regulations classify applicants strictly as male or female; a transgender person falls into neither category.

” Read ePaper News TOI Games Live Videos TOI Flashreads World City India Business Tech TOI Newsletters Cricket Sports Entertainment TV Voice Of Conscience Web Series Life & Style Education Speaking Tree Madras High...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
In Khajani Devi’s case too, the petitioner was a daughter of a freedom fighter. She was the sole surviving heir and entirely dependent on her father. She had been denied pension under similar circumstances, stating that a divorced daughter cannot be treated as a dependent on her parents. The plea that had been raised by the Union of India was initially

In Khajani Devi’s case too, the petitioner was a daughter of a freedom fighter. She was the sole surviving heir and entirely dependent on her father. She had been denied pension under similar circumstances, stating that a divorced daughter cannot be treated as a dependent on her parents. The plea that had been raised by the Union of India was initially

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 29353 of 2025 1. Thillai Lokanathan D/o Shanmuga Thevar, 12/14, Mylapooran Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version